On any of the donation threads where it came up and he replied to it, the most he ever did was some half hearted corporate PR “apology” (ironic)

  • irelephant [he/him]🍭@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Sure, but you can just make a script that migrates it.

    Right now, there isn’t any problems with the code, so there is no reason or incentive to fork it.

        • fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          13 hours ago

          It’s not technically impossible to fork and port lemmy-ui to piefed (the APIs are similar. Hell, you might not even need to modify the code.)

          I don’t mind not having lemmy-ui if i can keep using all the other lemmy clients, personally :D

          • irelephant [he/him]🍭@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            13 hours ago

            True, when people say the apis are similar, do you mean you could use a lemmy client with it, or that it would be easy to adapt a lemmy client for it?

            • fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 hours ago

              [AFAIK] The only thing right now, that’s stopping me from using say photon with piefed; is that most clients use the /api/v3 endpoint, but piefed only has /api/alpha. I bugged rimu about try to add a mock /api/v3 endpoint to see how far most lemmy clients would go with an unmodified instance; he’s yet to try that though.

              But beyond that trivial point, yes; it should be very easy to adapt a lemmy client. Andrew already did so, while knowing nothing about dart; jwr1 already ported interstellar; and AP is planning to port tesseract/dubvee to piefed.