• Jesus_666@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    I’m kinda planning on teaching my team how to use interactive rebases to clean the history before a merge request.

    The first thing they’ll learn is to make a temporary second branch so they can just toss their borked one if they screw up. I’m not going to deal with their git issues for them.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I’m kinda planning on teaching my team

      I’m not going to deal with their git issues for them.

      These two statements contradict each other.

      • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        51 minutes ago

        That’s why I’ll make damn sure they’ll make that second branch first.

        Mind you, the most likely result is that I’ll still see branches with 50+ commits with meaningless names because nobody ever rebases anything.