pastermil@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 20 hours agoCommitsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square31fedilinkarrow-up1656arrow-down19 cross-posted to: programmer_humor@programming.dev
arrow-up1647arrow-down1imageCommitsh.itjust.workspastermil@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 20 hours agomessage-square31fedilink cross-posted to: programmer_humor@programming.dev
minus-squarecorsicanguppy@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 hours ago I’m kinda planning on teaching my team I’m not going to deal with their git issues for them. These two statements contradict each other.
minus-squareJesus_666@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 hours agoThat’s why I’ll make damn sure they’ll make that second branch first. Mind you, the most likely result is that I’ll still see branches with 50+ commits with meaningless names because nobody ever rebases anything.
These two statements contradict each other.
That’s why I’ll make damn sure they’ll make that second branch first.
Mind you, the most likely result is that I’ll still see branches with 50+ commits with meaningless names because nobody ever rebases anything.