Not 🏴‍☠️, but your local library might have access already

what

Yum

Wish.com daemonculaba

Good luck everyone, I avoid toll now

Best time to build muscle for the rest of your life was 20 years ago. Second best time is now.

That looks metal as fuck

Yes, that’s a 1RM figure.

Don’t worry too much about how you stack up against standards, just try to make sure you’re making progress over time. Follow a reputable program for guidance until you know what works for you.

If you want to squat with less back involvement, you can also try belt squats instead.

https://www.technologyreview.com/2024/02/27/1088154/wifi-sensing-tracking-movements/

WiFi-based human motion detection through barriers

They seem to address that in the last paragraph:

The study combined mortality and demographic data obtained from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention WONDER database (in the US, the collection of mortality data is mandatory and standardized) with latitude data, economic data, and data on access to neurological health care. The primary results are based on US crude mortality rates at the state level. The analysis was then replicated at the global level using mortality data from the World Health Organization and obtained nearly identical results.

I’m unable to reach the original study though.

And got slurped up into chatgpt

Every time someone mentions X money over Y days on social media this is my immediate first thought. Second is that they’re just lying for clout.

The teenagers of Theseus

Using Thunder. That’s a bizarre behavior.

I replaced my entire tech stack with Postgres

Why does this link open in Chrome instead of my Lemmy client’s built-in browser?

At least in PG, that is explicitly not the case, unless I’m misunderstanding:

Similarly, a PL/pgSQL loop of the form FOR x IN query LOOP … END LOOP will never use a parallel plan, because the parallel query system is unable to verify that the code in the loop is safe to execute while parallel query is active.

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/when-can-parallel-query-be-used.html

At any rate, I feel like it’s questionable design to have a user making row-by-row decisions on hard deletes.

You can just insert directly to the helper/audit table, and delete using it, no need for the cursor loop. If you need a handle to go through the records one by one, something else has already gone wrong.

deleted by creator

at least put some foil on the iron, now it’s dirty for the next person