I am a person online.
I’ve read a few years ago of AI slop having like an unreadable signature on the bottom right, due to using a lot of data that had signatures there, including many from a same artist. I believe it was a Tweet by RJ Palmer. But what you describe seems more like someone is just putting their name on the slop they generate afterwards, with a simple image processing software.
Another possibility I find a bit less likely would be that it is like that old phenomenon where the ai tries to generate the signature, but it actually does it correctly because it got better at handling text and enough of the art used is from the same person to make a coherent one.
It’s a matter of scale, but gravity is often considered the weakest force. In quantum physics, it’s so weak it’s often impossible to measure.
I genuinely want to read it, if you don’t mind! I’m very interested in cube symbolism. [EDIT: I just noticed you say in advance you weren’t sharing it. If that is so, could I at least have one or two of your sources you used regarding cube symbolism?]
The word in itself is pretty meaningless. They use it to refer to anything they consider left wing, but using “woke” instead of “left-wing” gives it an air of illegetimacy, like something newly made up. Like, they wouldn’t say that the BPP was woke, but might consider that a movie about them is. You could say the meanings are different because “woke” is more about culture, not about economy or revolt against physical conditions… But that’s the point, they try to reduce politics to only “culture wars”. Because making up narratives around that is easier to them than having a class analysis.
Bodhi Linux. It had to be something that could run on a 32 bit laptop, because that’s what I used as a testing ground before committing to Linux.
Sphenodon?
You are in this council, but we do not grant you the rank of lizard.
But will the AI be able to see in its sample which words form a coherent pattern and which are arbitrary? Or will it always try to interpret the message as a whole, and as a result, misinterpret it all? Since the AI doesn’t actually “understand”, I wouldn’t expect it to recognize what should or shouldn’t be understandable.
I Brooklyn rage agree. Let us Carthage must be destroyed make an habit of this henceforth.
(a+d)
a=area of garden
d= depth of undergrowth
Adding an area and a distance? Seems wonky.
I’m tired od seing this slop, I wish this community (and others) would explicitly ban the use of generative AI already.
You’re just making me more convinced that “women” were invented by furniture companies to sell more bedframes.
I haven’t posted or commented on Reddit since over a month, but I haven’t deleted my account yet. I have consulted Reddit a few times since, notably when it showed up in the results for a question I was looking up, or to see the posts from the r/Askhistorians weekly roundup (of which I follow the RSS feed). While the way I’ve been using Reddit lately doesn’t require an account, I’m unsure of whether I intend to delete mine; partly because if for whatever reason, I needed to post a question somewherebit will get a big audience, that’s the biggest I can currently get, and partly because I don’t want all my great posts and comments of the past to be lost to history…
The White Lotus? Is this an Avatar Spinoff?
You can touch a sink to discharge!
If it’s only for a reverse image search, I use tineye.com . That being said, it doesn’t have all the functionalities of lens, like it doesn’t have an integrated AI to recognize the content of a pic or anything…
For copying text from a real world document, I also use OCR, which you can find on F-Droid.
I agree.
Tho this post is not actually about Australia