• 1 Post
  • 83 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle







  • In 1947, Naujocks was extradited to Denmark to stand trial. There, he was found guilty of his role in the murders of Danish resistance fighters and sentenced to 15 years in prison. However, in 1950, Naujocks’s sentence was reduced to 4 years, resulting in his immediate release.

    Following the trials, Naujocks worked as a businessman in Hamburg, where he eventually sold his story to the media as The Man who Started the War. He was alleged to have been involved in running ODESSA, together with Otto Skorzeny, who handled contracts with the Spanish government, supplying passports and arranging for funds. Naujocks and his associates handled former Nazi war criminals going to Latin America, being responsible for their reception and protection there.

    Retvrn to when starting wars had real consequences

    Don’t even have the excuse here of offering leaders favorable terms to stop the bloodshed earlier. Why prolong the fighting with a demand of unconditional surrender if you’re going to give even the middle managers a slap on the wrist?


  • Non-paywalled link: https://archive.is/G584y

    Since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine

    It really is something how almost all English-langage media uses the phrase “full-scale invasion” in lockstep.

    From a strictly military perspective, restrictions never help.

    “From a strictly military perspective” is a nonsense framing, especially in a relatively limited war like this. Militaries are for (1) resolving political questions when peaceful attempts at resolution break down, and (2) deterring other countries from walking away from serious attempts at peaceful resolution. There is no world where you set aside the ultimate political goals; that’s the whole point!

    The modest seizure of Russian territory may strengthen Ukraine’s bargaining position in negotiations, ease Russian pressure on Ukrainian defenses in the Donbas, or weaken Russian President Vladimir Putin politically, but it is unlikely to change the military picture in a significant way.

    Should have dispensed with the saber-rattling and started here. This isn’t going to change the overall direction of the war; at most it will prolong the inevitable.

    These are the last days of WWI, where people keep dying despite everyone knowing that the war’s end is imminent.








  • You’re talking nonsense. Yes, living people are currently causing climate change. Those most responsible have names and addresses.

    The world should have burned down to the groun… to nothingness 10 times over according to all the specialists/scientists.

    This is just embarrassingly ignorant. The climate is deteriorating faster than scientists predicted, not slower.

    Your answer to OP’s question is denial and a refusal to actually investigate the situation.





  • That’s just stupid. Are they really suggesting Ukraine should focus solely on grinding through fortified Russian defenses?

    That’s clearly a losing strategy, too, but the “we’ll fight them to the last Ukranian” crowd is still too far from reality to admit it.

    The best decision for the Ukranian people is to negotiate an end to the war as soon as possible, which means accepting that when you are losing a war the peace isn’t going to involve crazy shit like getting more territory than you started with (Crimea). They’ve lost, and they can come to terms with it now or do so later after a bunch more Ukranians die only get a worse outcome.

    The reason the Ukranian government isn’t doing that is because their NATO puppetmasters don’t give a shit about the casualties of their proxies – they just want to bleed Russia as much as possible. So without the option to negotiate, and with the impossibility of winning on the main front, they have to try Hail Mary gambits like the Kursk invasion.