• Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t buy this argument at all, they could have contributed towards a combined connector with the usb-if, but instead they made their own proprietary connector.

    • snowe@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They did contribute towards usb c. And lightning came out years before c did. They had promised to only switch connectors once a decade because people got so mad about the switch from the thirty pin to the lightning.

    • kirklennon@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      they could have contributed towards a combined connector with the usb-if

      There was already one in the works but it was still years ago. They wanted to ditch the dock connector and didn’t want to wait forever.

      • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lightning came out in 2012, USB-C came out in 2014, not exactly “forever”

        This is just cope man come on

        • kirklennon@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, that’s two years, and we’re also needing to look at hardware engineering decisions made in 2011 (since major components are finalized long in advance). Even if they knew then that USB-C would be ready in three years, that doesn’t mean it necessarily justifies keeping the dock connector that much longer, but there was also no guarantee it would be a viable option in 2014. How long do you stick with inferior options when you can just to it better yourself sooner? We have to keep in mind the reason we like industry standards in the first place. Ideally they lead to a better customer experience; they are not a goal in and of themselves, just because they are a standard.

          My point is that there were very real, entirely legitimate reasons why it was good for Apple’s customers that Apple introduced Lightning.