• Jamie@jamie.moe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The tech is interesting and has applications

    I used to say that, but I’ve given up on that idea. I’ve never seen a use of blockchain yet that didn’t boil down to being virtual money. NFTs could have had potential as a method of trade if they were tied to real ownership of things instead of just receipts saying you bought a cartoon monkey jpeg.

    But every time I think something would be a problem blockchain solves, I can always think of an existing, typically better, solution to that same problem. I think that space is too infested with grifters to attract anyone with a truly novel idea.

    • audaxdreik@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re getting downvoted by cryptobros, but you are absolutely correct, there is no good use for block chain and never will be

      It’s a fully public database among trustless parties. To the first point, there’s no reason any database can’t be made public if so desired. To the second point, for the block chain to have any meaning or value beyond itself, some authority eventually needs to interpret its contents. That authority might as well hold the database or, in trustless cases, a third party trustee. Nothing about it makes sense at a very base level, you don’t even need to explain the tech because it just doesn’t hold up logically.