• Orion (awooo)@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    They have already played along, all devices that have Google Play preinstalled have to pass this test.

    But locking you out of installing software is not the point, it’s much more insidious than that. What will happen is that major services you rely on will want your device to present a cryptographic proof it’s running the original software, which can’t be spoofed. So for example your YouTube would only send you over the video stream if it knows that on the other side there’s an unmodified app running on an unmodified OS. Same thing goes for your bank. At some point you’re so locked out of essential services when running a custom OS that nobody will do it, because these days you almost need a phone to function in society.

    The hardware doesn’t lock you out of your device, it lets remote servers present you with an ultimatum, if you don’t present the proof you’re out, if you do, that means you’re running the stock OS and thus can’t do anything.

    • Sloan the Serval@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      So, in other words, I’ve been halucinating the fact that these services work perfectly fine on my Omnirom-patched OnePlus 7 Pro?

      • Orion (awooo)@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nope! The point is that the hardware is deployed, and strong attestation is available.

        But for now, a lot of apps still rely on the old SafetyNet or weak integrity. So the clock is ticking, the more up to date devices running modern Android there are, the more likely these apps are to switch over to the new system and require hardware attestation, because why wouldn’t they once everyone is “ready” for it.

        I’m not sure what you’re trying to argue against, what I’m trying to say is that the technology is very dangerous and must be banned, I’m with you on user control. But I won’t fall into a false sense of security about being able to bypass everything, because we don’t have control over low level hardware as we do with software, so these megacorps have the upper hand.

        • Sloan the Serval@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not saying it wouldn’t be an issue, ideally this kind of stuff should be banned whether there’s a workaround or not, because the average user is still going to have to deal with. My point is that, well, if you build a 10 foot wall, someone’s going to make a 12 foot ladder to get over it.

          The system relies on an encryption key stored on the device, right? That’s actually a really stupid idea if you don’t want people breaking that encryption. Someone’s eventually going to figure out how to access that. Even the Nintendo Switch, previously notorious for being a completely airtight system, has been jailbroken.