• ZeroCool@feddit.ch
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      OK, so something with no citations or methodology is gospel, got it…

      I didn’t say that, now did I? I simply pointed out that criticizing a survey for being based on “less than 1% of the population” is fucking stupid because that’s just how polling works. Got it? Good. We’re done here.

      • MelodiousFunk@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The article does not clearly cite its sources. ‘Based on 1019 responses’ from who? Sydneysiders? People from the NT?

        This uncited survey from a for profit company, with major shareholders being venture capitalists, asset managers, shitbags, etc. with a history of possible poll manipulation means nothing.

        Was that edited in after the fact? Why are people dogpiling based on that first sentence and ignoring the rest?

      • Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        My point of contention was not just less than 1%, it was no citations as well. You just used that part.

        If I ask 1000 ac/dc fans what the best music genre is they probably are not going to say soft rock.

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The irony of course is that the gospels were made up completely. Except for the part in Luke and John where they admit to coping from other writers.