• UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    So it’s just arrogance on your part instead of ableism. That’s nice. ok

    Almost didn’t even bother responding

    Maybe you shouldn’t, especially because you’ve gone so far out of your way to defend a mysterious stranger with a bad take that has a very dubious recent post history.

    • Urist@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I might be somewhat arrogant for sure. Not going to apologize to you for being arrogant after your vilifying claims of alt and concern trolling though.

      Whose post history is dubious?

      EDIT: Also, how the fuck is calling you fucking special ableist?

      • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I might be somewhat arrogant for sure.

        nicholson-yes

        Not going to apologize to you for being arrogant

        No shit.

        after your vilifying claims

        You popped up out of nowhere to stick up for someone with a bad take that had a recent history of bad takes.

        EDIT: Also, how the fuck is calling you fucking special ableist?

        If you’re not bullshitting me (and the jury’s still out on that), “special” is a pretty common way to talk around implying that someone came from “special ed” or has “special needs” in a condescending way.

        • Urist@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          A little bit of a stretch to add the “needs” in “special needs” in order to make me out to be ableist. I do not believe you will admit as such though, but let me ask you this: Is it not reductive to the actual experiences of those with special needs who experience actual ableism, whenever someone makes up context so they can claim being subjected to it on internet forums?

          • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            A little bit of a stretch

            Speaking of a stretch, how many replies is this so far for you going this far out of your way when you piously claimed you shouldn’t be bothered (and you really shouldn’t have been) by the plight of an apparent total stranger with bad takes?

            • Urist@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Oof, now we are getting to the real questions. Not going to post it here, but will tell you in a message.

              • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                The answer is already here: you were full of shit about how you oh so very nearly didn’t reply the first time, especially not for the sake of a mysterious stranger with bad takes, but you were compelled to against the odds anyway.

                EDIT: I just got your private message. Oh boy.

                You are going to think I am ironic, but for what it’s worth I am not: I think you are a legitimately nice person who are acting out from feelings of pain and taking it out on anyone in the vicinity.

                There’s that ableistic concern trolling that I had suspected all along. congratulations