• atro_city@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    104
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Isn’t the problem with Netflix that nobody can count on a second season no matter how well the first season does? So many good shows have been cancelled after the first season because Netflix doesn’t collect data correctly. And it’s now a self-repeating cycle:

    • everybody knows Netflix will cancel great shows
    • people choose not get invested in shows
    • shows don’t do as well as they could
    • Netflix cancels the show
    • rinse, repeat

    I didn’t notice I was doing it too until an article popped up (Forbes wasn’t the first) and it clicked: I wait for at least 2 seasons and an announcement of a third before watching a Netflix series, otherwise it’s just a waste of time. Evidently, others do it too.

    • paultimate14@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      1 day ago

      Even shows that do get more seasons often see their budgets slashed. It’s similar to blockbuster movies that get cheap direct-to-tv or direct-to-home video sequels.

      The Witcher comes to mind. I know a lot of hardcore GAMER fans had complaints about them deviating from the games, but even worse imo was the budget. The lighting, the CGI, the makeup. The acting even seems worse (maybe fewer takes, less editing budget?). The first season looked like it was trying to compete with Game of Thrones and other HBO shows. The second season was a step back, but still looked good. The 3rd season looked like a soap opera.

      • SpacetimeMachine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        It wasn’t hardcore gamer fans, at least the ones I knew were hardcore book fans who hated how they destroyed some of their favorite characters and moments.

      • graff@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago
        1. The rights they got were for the books only, so it makes sense that they wouldn’t adapt things from the sequel video games
        2. The games changed things from the books too, so they’re consistent in that at least

        I’m not excusing garbage, mind, but some people draw the line in odd places

        • Alaik@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          21 hours ago

          The moment henry cavill bounced and all the leaks about him being pissed about the direction and the writers openly mocking the source material came out, I wrote it off.

          • Paradachshund@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            20 hours ago

            The changes were honestly just weird. I usually can understand changes to source material from book to screen because you have to condense somewhere, but it felt like they just threw out all of it and made their own story instead but with a few beats still disconcertingly present. It was high budget fan fiction (or I guess anti-fan fiction based on what you said!)

    • Pyr@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      Shows need to be greenlit and funded for at least three seasons after the decision is made to film it in my opinion.

      Just trying out one seasons to see if it sticks is not the way to go.