weird@sub.wetshaving.social to memes@lemmy.world · 7 天前Historical context matterssub.wetshaving.socialimagemessage-square31linkfedilinkarrow-up1606arrow-down17
arrow-up1599arrow-down1imageHistorical context matterssub.wetshaving.socialweird@sub.wetshaving.social to memes@lemmy.world · 7 天前message-square31linkfedilink
minus-squareSkua@kbin.earthlinkfedilinkarrow-up23·7 天前Isn’t RPS “meant” to be a game rather than a way to decide randomly between two options? There’s an element of skill involved since you can attempt to avoid playing patterns and identify patterns in your opponent’s play in repeated rounds
minus-squareLanguageIsCool@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·7 天前In game theory, odds and evens is called matching pennies, and RPS is the 3-strategy generalization of matching pennies. Both are games with cyclic behavior and no pure Nash equilibria.
minus-squareSkua@kbin.earthlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·7 天前Fair enough! That’s not a field I’ve got any knowledge of
Isn’t RPS “meant” to be a game rather than a way to decide randomly between two options? There’s an element of skill involved since you can attempt to avoid playing patterns and identify patterns in your opponent’s play in repeated rounds
In game theory, odds and evens is called matching pennies, and RPS is the 3-strategy generalization of matching pennies.
Both are games with cyclic behavior and no pure Nash equilibria.
Fair enough! That’s not a field I’ve got any knowledge of