• Damarcusart [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Because stock images often do charge for their use in articles like this, or at the very least require proper attribution. Using an AI is the easier and lazier way to get that done.

      Also wouldn’t surprise me if the boss’ failson who works as the manager is convinced that they need to go “all in” on AI and demands their writers all use it as much as possible.

    • CarmineCatboy2 [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      1 day ago

      hypothesis one: pinterest was flooded with AI art and now so is google search

      hypothesis two: your boss wants you to use AI. having AI write your article and then having AI make the image makes for two uses out of the 50 in your production quotas.

      • Strayce@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        hypothesis two

        Jhezes fuck, this is it, isn’t it? They already paid for the subscription so if it doesn’t get used it’s a waste of money and won’t be in the budget next year.

    • woodenghost [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      As always, it gets weirder, the longer you look. Is the left horse black or white? Or both? Why is it cut different then the other one? Why are the pieces behind the white ones black too?