So there’s this thing people do, it’s harmless enough, but it also sort of hints at a completely incoherent style of thinking. It is absolutely unfair to judge people by random shit they write casually, after all I write like 3 geeked out baboons stacked atop one and other and yet I am a noble and refined rat.

Nonetheless I’m a judgy shit so I do. Ok so the thing? It’s when people use a quote or situation from fiction as a predictor of what will happen in reality. A concrete example from earlier today paraphrased:

p1: I think blah blah thing will happen

p2: Ah but remember men in black? a person is reasonable, people are dumb panicky animals

me: teakettle noises

The causality is utterly confused, MiB cannot be used as evidence, it is written that way because the writer wanted a character to say that. It’s possible a writer wanted a character to say that because the writer believed it to be true, but it’s also possible that it was included for many other reasons.

screeeeeeeeeee

Anyway, share your thoughts. Also your own ridiculous rhetoric irritations.

  • WoodScientist [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    You’re confusing mathematical proof for rhetoric. They are not the same thing.

    A man will not have himself killed for a half pence a day and a petty distinction; you must speak to the soul in order to electricify him.

    • insurgentrat [she/her, it/its]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah and lying to people or bribing them are also good tactics if your goal is just manipulating people you have no respect for. Using them degrades yourself, profanes society, and shows that you have nothing but contempt for your interlocutor.

      • WoodScientist [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        We are not robots. We are beings of emotion and passion. People are not persuaded by simple logic.

        You’re just bitching about human nature. Have you never talked to a human being at all? People don’t speak in formal proofs. People aren’t engaged by formal proofs. You’re not “profaning society” by using the most human forms of communication. Emotion is a key part of communication.

        Stop being anti-human.

        • insurgentrat [she/her, it/its]@hexbear.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          You seem to have a very extreme view of who I am.

          Good use of emotion in discussion: “Imagine if every time you said you loved your wife people complained about how you always had to bring heterosexualilty into things. Wouldn’t you find that really isolating?”

          Bad use: “Aren’t I a good person? Don’t you love me? You’re spitting in the face of a thousand years of tradition by being gay. Do you want this family to die out?”

          If you are trying to make a factual claim about the future. aka a prediction, and you use as evidence for your beliefs an event that didn’t happen, you are an idiot at best.