• FooBarrington@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Why is that silly? As long as the classes follow a strict naming scheme & have useful abstractions, that seems much better than having to give every node a unique class name that doesn’t necessarily have much meaning. I can’t count the number of “container” and “wrapper” and “content” classes I’ve seen & written, where the names don’t describe anything useful.