I should probably come out and say that I really don’t get them, but I’ll try not to be a contrarian in this thread lol. Looking for genuine perspectives.
The SNES through PS2 days were the golden era of JRPGs imo. FF4-FF10 plus FF tactics are all legendary titles I’d highly recommend even in spite of their age. When I played the FF10 remaster sometime ago I was blown away by how fleshed out and complete it felt compared how most games today. I never owned a Switch however so there is no doubt a lot of good recent JRPGs out there I missed like the Fire Emblem games and such.
You can easily emulate a switch on PC btw, assuming it’s beefy enough (no idea about the required specs). Less intensive games e.g. Ace Attorney even work on mobile!
Scenes like this make me giggle.
nope hate them
I have started many but finished only a handful. I have finished the Persona games because even though the story is not great the gameplay mechanics and the banger soundtrack are amazing. The others are the Final Fantasy 7 Remake games. I would say they skirt the line of being JRPG because of the combat. But they seem to have made a conscious decision to adhere to the JRPG aesthetic despite the high fidelty graphics and modernised gameplay. And I they campy JRPG bits are the weaker aspect of it.
deleted by creator
i used to but damn the almost obligatory grinding in them has made me hate them. i only can stand the Atlus JRPGs as of late.
also as i have grown older, these games have become comically easy even on the highest difficulty, which kinda makes them boring. really the only joy i find in them is making super overpowered builds.
I will say I have never played one through to the end, and my experience comes just from friends who’ve had them when I was young. But man they are way too “Japanese” for me. I know it’s in the name, but anything to do with Anime just rubs me the wrong way.
As a young kid I loved Dragon Warrior 1 and 2 and Shining force 2 but at the time it was that or mario or sonic. As the number of game types grew I moved on and never went back.
As a rule I’m not a fan, but there have been a few select ones I did enjoy. Chrono Trigger, Radiant Historia, and Chained Echoes are a few that I found to be pretty engrossing. All these games have a strong plot and interesting characters, and you end up wanting to know how the story plays out. I find the weakest aspect of JPRGs is the combat because it tends to get very formulaic, and you end up having to do a lot of grinding. The three games I mentioned are on the less grindy side of the spectrum. There’s also a sub genre with tactical RPGs like Fire Emblem where I find combat is a lot more interesting.
Good to see another who likes Radiant Historia.
It’s a real gem, I only found out about it because a friend of mine recommended it. It doesn’t seem to be well known.
Which version do you play? I prefer the original DS version.
yup, that’s the one I ended up playing
I just don’t like the fact that there’s no real choice or barely any choice.
Yeah it’s closer to reading a book in that regard, it’s a story the game tells you.
I’m aware, but I wish I had a bit more agency and control.
Even the combat at times just feels a bit too… Err, rigid? Idk.
Yeah, that’s why as a rule I’m not a fan of the genre. I find JRPGs often lack in the gameplay department which kind of defeats the point of making a game.
Yes, I feel player agency is generally more important than, say, “gameplay” or “graphics.”
Those last two are just vague concepts to my mind. Gameplay should be replaced with something more specific like “agency” and graphics should be replaced with “power” or “aesthetics.”
Gameplay is sometimes a bit too vague of a term to really tell you anything.
I find it depends on the game. The way I look at it is that as long as it meets my expectations I can enjoy it. If I’m playing JRPG I know what I’m getting into. At the end of the day the real question is whether you’re being entertained or not. :)
It really depends. Not all jrpg’s are equal. I can play final fantasy 7 all day but cannot stand dragon quest (as much as I hate to admit it). I love menu-based battles, but I think it’s a delicate balance which is easy to mishandle. I think ideally, animations need to be enjoyable to watch (you’re going to be seeing the same animations through large portions of the playtime), menu flow needs to be fluid, and ideally I think battles need to be able to be resolved in just a few actions. When standard battles linger, I think that contributes to my own fatigue with a game, personally. Also games which have engaging quirks in battles add a lot of value to the experience, a la super Mario rpg. Good jrpg’s are some of the best games of all time, imo.
Genuinely never tried one. I’m looking for the perfect introduction to the series.
Personally, the JRPGs I enjoy have something chess-like to the combat - each character has their own way of acting, and you have to balance their actions around the turn order and enemy’s actions. Throw in some rock-paper-scissor elements and an ult mechanic like limit breaks or summons and it creates enough considerations to keep me interested in planning out both the current and future turns without it turning into an overwhelming amount of micromanaging.
I played Final Fantasy 4 and Pokemon Gen 1 at a fairly young age and it left a solid impression on me
It depends on the JRPG.
Me personally, I love the combat, but don’t like the fact there are no choices.
idk there is a nostalgic soft spot for them for me because I grew up with the SNES and watching my neighbor play FFVII
Never really got into the genre though mainly because I always disliked turn based games until I got into the XCOM remake some years ago and also getting old and appreciating the more relaxed pace.
