cross-posted from: https://feddit.uk/post/27573974

The growing debate over the future of intellectual property law in the age of AI took a wild turn in the past few days when Jack Dorsey, the co-founder of Twitter and Block, and initially a leading figure at Bluesky, declared he would like to see all IP law eliminated.

“Delete all IP law,” Dorsey wrote on X on Friday (April 11).

Elon Musk, owner of X and head of President Donald Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), chimed in by saying “I agree.”

Ed Newton-Rex, a former VP of Audio at Stability AI and now a leading campaigner for the protection of intellectual property, described Dorsey and Musk’s assertion as “tech execs declaring all-out war on creators who don’t want their life’s work pillaged for profit.”

Pushback also came from Nicole Shanahan, a Silicon Valley entrepreneur, patent specialist and lawyer who served as Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s running mate in the 2024 election.

“Actual IP professional here – NO,” she wrote in response to Dorsey’s tweet. “IP law is the only thing separating human creations from AI creations. If you want to reform it, let’s talk!”

To which Dorsey responded: “Creativity is what currently separates us, and the current system is limiting that, and putting the payments disbursement into the hands of gatekeepers who aren’t paying out fairly.”

Notably, Dorsey is Chairman of Block, Inc., the company formerly known as Square, which owns music streaming service TIDAL.

Dorsey’s tweet likely doesn’t reflect official TIDAL policy on the issue of IP. The company’s CEO, Jesse Dorogusker, told MBW a few years ago that he views music as being “undervalued and underpriced.”

One can only imagine what the value of music would look like if copyright protections were to disappear altogether. It would not be a stretch to imagine that its value would fall close to zero, along with the value of other commercialized cultural products, and the value of labor carried out by artists and other creators.

Responding to Dorsey, some on social media pointed out that Dorsey’s own businesses have benefited from IP protections.

“Very easy to say after you’ve made billions off your IP,” one commenter wrote.

  • haverholm@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    A fairly unsurprising statement from two people whose combined intellectual contributions are close to none. But they still may impress their idiocy upon a president who bolsters his lack of acuity with an impulse to tear things down.

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    IP law (and protections) encompasses:

    • patents
    • copyright
    • trademarks

    So as an example, elimination of all IP law would mean I could start my own social media company called “X” and there would be no law preventing it. “X” is a trademark with protections preventing others from making social media companies with the same name. You could too. Everyone could start a social media company called “X”. Further, you could download the public facing look and feel code of today’s twitter, and make your X social media site look exactly the same. The HTML code used to make the site is copyright protected. You could copy that and use that too without any legal barriers.

    You could also create derivative works like X brand toothpaste using the same styling and colors (called “trade dress” in IP law) along with the logo (previously copyrighted art) and name (previously trademarked). Nothing legally Musk could do to stop you.

    • Kowowow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      You could legally make a copy of sites to collect logins too couldn’t you?

  • Greyghoster@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    10 hours ago

    When billionaires want to get rid of private ownership of intellectual property, which it turns out they want to use, next will be patents. Strange, most patents are owned by corporations which means billionaires own most, so patents are safe?

    If Musk and Dorsey are singing from the same sheet it implies that Dorsey can’t be trusted either. So much for BlueSky.

  • galoisghost@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 hours ago

    And how will they funnel their profits to tax havens. Oh right they mean IP laws pertaining to regular people not corporations.