• OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Literally the majority of the video is just random left-bashing lmao

    And then proposing “super-capitalism” as a solution what an absolute clown

  • SuiXi3D@fedia.io
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    At this point I’m convinced the only way to defeat Trump and his band of Nazis is to shoot them all in their fucking faces.

  • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I’m 50:50 there will be another election. And I’m 50:50 on it being rigged if there is one.

    Even if we have one, and it’s not rigged, the Dems are proposing absolute jack shit for the people. So I don’t see how they could even win a fair election.

    We need a new party or a serious nation wide event if we want to put an end to projec 2025

    • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Holy shit, that second bullet point. The hundreds of thousands of people donating small sums of money are somehow less representative of the electorate than the two hundred people donating over a million dollars each, because reasons (just not mathematically sound ones)

      • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 hours ago

        The second bullet point is itself a paradox. By definition hundreds of small donations would represent the electorate better than individual large donors.

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        7 hours ago

        It’s the 4th bullet point that gets me. “We should spend more time going to right-wing-dominated spaces (and also restaurants)”. Because only right-wing communities are “real”. Anything lefties do is elitist.

    • pivot_root@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Is this verified? If so, congratulations, Democratic party leadership. Once again, you’re planning on doing the exact opposite of what you should be doing. Their leftist voter turnout is going to plummet again while they try court Republicans—who often vote by party rather than policy.

      The party should "embrace-patriotism, community, and traditional American imagery

      Playing into nostalgia and nationalism. A strategy taken straight from the other party’s playbook.

      Democrats should “ban far-left candidate questionnaires and refuse to participate in forums that create ideological purity tests” and “move away from the dominances small-dollars donors whose preferences may not align with the broader electorate”

      Condemning progressiveness, leaving their policies either to do nothing or slide the country even more into conservatism.

      Abandoning their actual “small-dollars” donors (constituents) whose preferences may not align with the broader electorate the corporate donors.

      They should “push back against far-left staffers and groups that exert a disproportionate influence on policy-and messaging”

      Going to screw progressive politicians yet again, leaving only moderates and conservatives.

      Candidates should “get out of elite circles and into real communities (e.g., tailgates, gun shows, local restaurants, churches)”

      Actively and deliberately court voters from conservative hotspots.

      The party needs to “own the failures of Democratic governance in large cities and commit to improving local government.”

      Either this means the goal is deregulation, or that they don’t plan on addressing issues outside of rural areas. Maybe both.

    • Fester@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      People really need to show up to the primaries from now on. Tired of this shit.

    • zephorah@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      This is how you continue to lose. The first bullet point is correct. The rest is fail.

  • Gsus4@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Could already have had two terms of Bernie (or Gore too), but humans, eh.

    • stopdropandprole@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      certain, specific humans, have a great deal more culpability than others.

      less useful blaming billions when a couple dozen people engineered the choices for the rest of us, especially on climate.

      the biggest problem opposition groups have nowadays is targeting the wrong people to oppose. I know who my enemies are and it’s not so self defeatingly simplistic as humans = bad.

  • RangerJosey@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    8 hours ago

    If the democratic machine would let him. He’d do a bang up job. But the DNC will mobilize all they have to stop him. Damn the cost. Just as they’ve done in the past.

  • WatDabney@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 hours ago

    That’s what the voters have been trying to tell the DNC since 2016.

    But the DNC’s ears are plugged with corporate cash.

  • Kaboom@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Oh hell yeah! I totally support you guys trying that! I’m sure it’ll work out perfectly for us!

  • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    I don’t think that Democrats should turn away from their growing number of middle-class supporters in order to pivot to a platform that has no record of winning elections. The US economy is going to suffer over the next couple of years and the appeal of a “return to normalcy” party like the present-day Democrats will grow.

    It’s worth considering why the Democrats failed to persuade the majority of voters that electing Trump in 2024 would be (among other things) an economic disaster, but nonetheless it’s going to be an economic disaster and voters won’t be happy. I expect that Trumpism will have no political future if (and that’s a big if) free elections are preserved.

    • Deceptichum@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 hours ago

      When has a leftist campaign been run in earnest in a US election? Can’t remember any from the Dems in my lifetime, so I’m curious how it can have a record either way.

      • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        A good frame of reference would be FDR and the New Deal Coalition which dominated the electorate. They did basic social democracy and just kept winning.

          • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            I’m not convinced that Trump has done better against the Democrats than an ordinary pre-MAGA Republican candidate would have. It’s normal for the party in power to switch every eight years, and in that context the unusual thing about Trump is not that he won in 2016 but that he lost in 2020. Biden/Harris’s loss in 2024 is also unusual but so is running a senile candidate, forcing him to step aside far too late, and then replacing him with his vice president who has no significant accomplishments and no way to distance herself from his unpopular policies.

            There is something important that Democrats need to change about their strategy, but that’s running candidates based on their appeal to the public rather than on their seniority within the party. I had hoped that they learned that lesson after Hillary Clinton’s failure but they didn’t. I think they will do well if they run a young, charismatic centrist like Bill Clinton or Obama in 2028.

  • shoulderoforion@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Fuck you. Bernie, AOC, Rashida, Ilhan, and the rest of the Squad, cheered on the “Genocide Joe” “From The River To The Sea” marches, which were on the NEWS every day and every night of the Spring, Summer, and Fall of an Election Year. More Young Republicans, Latino and Arab Americans voted for Donald Trump than have ever voted for any Republican candidate in history before. Young Democrats, when faced with the binary choice between the continuation of Democracy, and Fascist disassembly threatening the climate, all their civil rights, their nation, and the entire free world, couldn’t find it within themselves to meet the lowest bar of effort, and didn’t vote. Donald Trump won his second Presidential election by 2.3%. Fuck Them, their politics is bankrupt and ruinous, and everyone was screaming this at you and them all last year, but you kept raising the Leftists flag, and you lost it all. Fuck You.

    • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Hey there, Betelgeuse (I’m assuming you’re that shoulder of Orion). I’d just like to point out that the democrats have deliberately and repeatedly tried a failing strategy of just phoning it in and trying to win on nothing more than “I’m not Donald Trump” and celebrity guest appearances. They knew they were fucking cooked, and I did too when they released that video of Obama lecturing down at black men for not supporting Kamala enough. If you have to lecture your base, they didn’t fuck up, you did.

    • SparrowHawk@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      No, fuck the party for not reading the room. Bernie and co. were trying to build an alternative, bringing the left where it should have been. The unwillingness to change brought defeat and they saw what the party couldn’t. Why can’t your see what? The dems would have lost with or without bernie’s support. You’re just butthurt their criticism was correct all along

        • Netux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Young democrats don’t exist. Young independents didn’t vote for dems because the dems offer them nothing. When people said bernie was the compromise it was the truth. He’s not far enough left to make the left happy, but was far enough to get votes.

    • Grimy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      You basically named the only politicians that publicly condemned Israel. I can’t say I’m surprised seeing one of the few zionists on lemmy disliking them.

      And this is what, 5 times you copy and paste the same message, subtly implying the “genocide joe” people are the same as the “river to the sea” crowd.

      There’s a difference between rightly calling out Biden for his support of genocide and calling for another separate genocide. We just want Israel to stop taking crowds of innocents and turning them into dust. It’s blatant what you are trying to imply, nobody here is chanting “from the river to the sea”.

      The democrats lost because they gave their support to people like you, who want to hate and genocide an entire population, instead of the actual voters they are meant to represent.

      • Deceptichum@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        I straight up want Israel gone and the land managed by the original inhabitants not some European colonists.

        From the river to the sea is fine.

    • Zagorath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Young Democrats…didn’t vote

      In 4 of the 7 key states, Harris received more votes than Biden did in 2020. In the 3 where she received less, Trump still would have won based on how many more votes he got even if Harris’s vote count was unchanged compared to Biden in 2020.

      This “Democrats lost because of Gaza” angle is convenient. Both sides like it use it. “Moderates” like to blame the “far left” for discouraging voters by calling out the inaction on the genocide. Leftists blame the moderates because they refused to actually denounce the genocide or commit to stopping it. Both side’s arguments are based in assumptions that do not bear out once you look at the actual votes.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I mean a whole lot of voters did put the biggest reason they sat out as Gaza. There was a poll on it by YouGov. Now let’s not get that wrong; Harris lost because her campaign was a shitshow, so blaming Gaza voters in particular is improductive, but even with a moderately good candidate it would’ve probably been close as they would’ve had to win without Michigan and Arizona.