SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.world · 3 days agoHousing Rulelemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square216fedilinkarrow-up11.02Karrow-down120cross-posted to: fuckcars@lemmy.world
arrow-up11Karrow-down1external-linkHousing Rulelemmy.worldSoftestSapphic@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.world · 3 days agomessage-square216fedilinkcross-posted to: fuckcars@lemmy.world
minus-squarenull_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·15 hours agoYeah, but those places have either poorer employee conditions or higher population density. Neither of which are desirable.
minus-squareFelixCress@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 hours ago Yeah, but those places have either poorer employee conditions UK would like a word. higher population density. Neither of which are desirable Says who?
Yeah, but those places have either poorer employee conditions or higher population density. Neither of which are desirable.
UK would like a word.
Says who?