• MangoCats@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 minutes ago

      It is, but the tellings I have heard of the Peter Principal generally have the incompetence leveling off at some lower strata where they can no longer do the job well so they don’t advance any further.

      The unspoken implication of Icahn’s advancement theory is that management doesn’t really do much of importance in these companies, basically any idiot can rise to the top. Of course that’s not true, people can always actively undermine their own success, so they at least have to be smart enough to not do that.

      Highly successful CEO I met over dinner once had this to say about his outstanding company growth performance: 1) it wasn’t him, it was luck of being in the right place at the right time and not screwing it up too badly. 2) The hardest thing was choosing who to hire. If at least half of his new hire choices didn’t actively make things worse, he considered that to be a good batch.