• ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    What I’m getting from your disjointed screed is that you’re implying that the Donbas shelling is a hoax. You nazi pieces if shit will say anything

    • harc@szmer.info
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      To a certain degree. Did Ukr fire shots into Donbas? I’d be surprised if it didn’t. Was it a genocidal constant barrage that Rus propaganda made you believe it was? There would be clear evidence of that, and you people have none and go into vatnik screeching anyone asks for it. And if it was… again why wouldn’t the Russian state just relocate these people?
      I don’t know if you get it but the brain-dead mantra about supposed shelling sounds like a joke to everyone outside you bubble, so much it doesn’t make sense.

      BTW please refrain from attempting to insult me. For one - it only makes you look like you can’t hold an argument, and two I’ve no respect for you as a person at the moment anyway, so it’s as touching as a drunk hobos mumblings and a waste of everyone’s time.

        • harc@szmer.info
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Oh no just dont report me to the authorities, please!

          lold. Fucken misserable bootlickers. Why cant you just come up with clear visual evidence? Come on, 10 years of destruction and genocide over artillery, that has to leave a massive mark like you know the sort of these images of Marinka:

          As destroyed by Russia. So if this stuff documented and possible to show is not genocide of Ukrainians, but there was a genocide of… russian-speaking Ukrainians in one particular area - whers the proof?

            • harc@szmer.info
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              17 hours ago

              So… no evidence still? You know you should try to actually prove a point not only demand someone to accept it so such an accusation will work?

              • SexMachineStalin [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                12 minutes ago

                How about an thought exercise? Don’t want? Tough shit, lib.

                Let’s say that hypothetically, the US violently overthrows the Duma Boko presidency of Botswana because he is demanding for the US to halt their drone operations in the Thebephatshwa Airbase (which he has actually stated a month ago), installed a more extremist pro-Western aligned leader along the lines of Gayton McKenzie or similar, began to shift more drones, missiles, F-35s and those 1,000kg bombs into Botswana to sabre-rattle against South Africa and even invite extremist militias from ISIS, Azov, IDF, Pissad, armed the AWB, NAFO, etc.

                The west justifies the overthrow of Botswana under the guise of Botswana suddenly needing “democracy” and as a platform to “punish” South Africa for “reasons”. It also doesn’t take long for the new regime to start terrorising and killing South Africans who are living, studying or trading in Botswana. Obviously the South African government isn’t going to take kindly to Apartheid violence upsurging in a neighbouring country, especially when Western weapons are suddenly flowing into Thebephatshwa, pointing at the Gauteng Province 400 kilometers away. The SANDF is deployed along the border and South Africa immediately sets up red lines and also frequently demands the airbase shut down under threat of war (This was actually a concern in 2019 by the EFF who suggested going to war against Botswana if that airbase wasn’t closed, citing a threat to South Africa’s security as justification. Of course the present relationship between the two countries is generally good and war is not at all likely for the foreseeable future).

                Time passes and Botswana continues to ignore/violate South Africa’s demands. Ultimately the final red line is crossed when a terrorist attack is carried out in Gauteng by a militant group from Botswana, regardless if it was successful or intercepted by authorities. South Africa then declared war against Botswana and moves in, firing rockets, sending in the tanks and the SANDF begins marching into Gaborone. Of course with South Africa no longer being a Western country, there is widespread condemnations from Western governments and media, the racism factory in overdrive and South Africa is sanctioned yet again, much more severely this time around.

                How are you going to react once South Africa goes to war, when all red lines have been crossed in a vain attempt to get a belligirent post-coup government entity to behave? Even as a bigger, stronger nation there are still legitimate security concerns because maybe, just maybe, South Africa doesn’t want the AmeriKKKans or the West in general to point those 1,000kg bombs at every apartment tower in Johannesburg? The situation is exactly the same with regards to Russia and Ukraine over the last 11 years.

                Death to AmeriKKKa, Death to NATO