First all the bs with Twitter and Elon, then Reddit having an exodus to Lemmy (not complaining lol), then Twitch. Are we like, in an alternate self healing dimension or something?

  • sharp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    From Cory Doctorow:

    Here is how platforms die: First, they are good to their users; then they abuse their users to make things better for their business customers; finally, they abuse those business customers to claw back all the value for themselves. Then, they die.

    https://www.wired.com/story/tiktok-platforms-cory-doctorow/

    Some of it is because we had a decade of cheap borrowing which has come to an end and many of these platforms were never profitable.

        • donio@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          In Timeline-α the Visitors didn’t turn away in disgust and Contact was approved. The Uplift process is well underway, environmental conditions have been stabilized and restoration is progressing well. Space travel is still restricted to the Solar System but Humanity is on track to full Membership. Ambassador Harambe has resumed his duties on the Council.

  • effingnerd@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have a sinking feeling that these moves are not about money, but more about power and manipulation. If you squeeze these user bases such that the savviest users are forced out, those more likely to ask “Why?” about damn near anything, you will own access to a group of people that can be influenced to think/do/buy whatever the top management and/or majority shareholders want. If you lose a few million users, what does it matter if they were dissidents to your goals?

    • kool_newt@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is where my mind goes. Kinda convenient that Twitter and Reddit, both likely particularly dangerous to those seeking power happen to be destroyed seemingly intentionally in the same year ahead of a sure to be insane U.S. election season.

      • burgersc12@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hmm, kinda interesting. A lot of Trump shit was spread on Reddit during the 2016 election, makes sense they would try to get rid of anyone who would oppose that content

    • Maaji@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Not money per se, but the oil of the 21st century: data.

      I guarantee it’s primarily about improving their ability to harvest and sell user data.

      • imbrucy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly. The native apps can gather so much more info than a website and they have to kill third party apps to force people to use the official client.

    • half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      100% power There’s parallels to the writer strikes Netflix ceo got like 2x the money that all the writers are asking for in bonus so it’s not about money It’s something else

  • Kevin Herrera@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    From everything I have observed, businesses are hunkering down for a recession in the next fiscal year. It explains the lay offs, the penny pinching, and puzzling decisions that look like business suicide.

    For services that are free for users, advertising revenue and investment fund raisers are the only thing keeping them afloat. With banks like SVB getting seized by the FDIC, it’s starting to scare investors. Advertisers are seeing the writing on the wall that people will stop spending as much as they used to. We are also probably seeing jacked up pricing across the board because businesses are taking what they can before it’s gone.

    So what’s left? Squeeze users for money. Additionally, shed users that actually cost them money and these tend to be power users. The question, which everyone seems to be assuming is a foregone conclusion, is if this shedding strategy will end up killing the service. In reality, we don’t know but the idealists would sure feel good if someone else ate their market share.

    I’m just glad that federation is picking up steam in the social media space.

    • Otakeb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Also what hasn’t been touched on very much in this thread is the increase in interest rates from the Federal Reserve. The money hose has shut off and expansionary business policy won’t work for the foreseeable future even disregarding a recession. All these internet companies have developed and grown in an essentially 0% interest rate environment that rewarded growth beyond all else. With rates increasing, investment in risky companies that may or may not grow is becoming a less attractive option and so I bet a lot of these non-profitable, growth-focused web companies are seeing liquidity dry up and are having to reach profitability to avoid bankruptcy since servicing new debt in this current interest environment is basically impossible without solid cashflow and a clear corporate vision.

      This is leading to all these companies suddenly raising prices, cutting staff, choking competition, and cheaping out to try and break even instead of grow. It’s a paradigm shift.

      • Rickety Thudds@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Crazy to hear people talking about this stuff out in the wild. Feels like I’m on superstonk, only place I tend to hear anyone connecting these dots.

        • Otakeb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Speaking of superstonk, is there a good superstonk or wsb personalfinance lemmy community? I am subbed to the beehaw finance community, but it’s really not a tube yet and seems to be a bit more economics leaning than pure personal finance or investing.

          The subs I spend a lot of time on were FIRE, financialindependence, wsb, and personal finance and I miss them lol.

          • Rickety Thudds@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            The Canadian GameStop folks have a community on lemmy.ca, but we are still very few.

            I would like to join a federated wsb community too, if there’s anyone with any integrity willing to run it impartially. Anyone running such a place has a conflict of interest imo, the tendency is moral hazard. At least with single stock communities you know their motive.

    • MyNameIsFred@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree with most of what you said. I would say classifying SVB as a seizure is probably not accurate. The FDIC only came in when it was clear SVB was going to fold and in fact insured far more than the 250k per account guaranteed. Mainly to try and stem a run on midsize banks because

      1. Many companies had large holdings, undiversified in these banks

      2. The banks were borderline negligent with how they handled those deposits, sticking them all in “safe” government bonds that ruins liquidity.

      Once the interest rate on the bonds was lower than the base borrowing rate, no one would buy the bonds instead of just buying new bonds with a much higher guaranteed return.

      So, given that, I would say the FDIC instead bailed out the banks. Something they would never do for you or I, or even a business with similar valuation as any of the banks customers.

  • tallwookie@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    twitter was overvalued. reddit has made a lot of questionable business decisions over the last decade or so but their recent API change will be their death knell. it feel like a cash grab. I personally only use Twitch to watch Bob Ross reruns :P

  • Pigeon@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    This Lemmy migration does feel like waaaaay more positive of a result than I ever expected from reddit getting worse.

    I’ve always appreciated the idea of the fediverse, but mastodon and the twitter-style of social media has never appealed to me, and Lemmy used to be so tiny and niche, so I didn’t invest much time in it until now. But this sure is nice, comparatively. I’m probably on here too much though!

  • AnagrammadiCodeina@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    The reality is that nothing is really dying and nothing is really changing. Twitter is still fully operational and other than a small hit nothing happened. Twitch already did a step back. For Reddit we’ll see but only a really small percentage of reddit is using third party apps.

    • naoseiquemsou@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not the services that are dying, but the internet as we used to know.

      Change is natural, but the services are all changing in a way not beneficial forthe users.

    • dillydogg@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the “the internet is dying” perspectives are all incredibly overblown. They aren’t going anywhere anytime soon. I remember all of the “Facebook is dead, I don’t know anyone using Facebook!” posts, but I suspect many here are invested in some index fund that is being pulled upwards by Meta.

      • Gullevek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        But how many people are still exchanging facebook contacts? Because I haven’t met anyone anymore …

        • dillydogg@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Good point! I suspect it’s a lot more than we think. My parents are definitively still involved in doing this.

          But on the other hand, does exchanging contacts mean anything to Facebook anymore? I don’t think that’s important to their income stream anymore. If the OP meant “these sites are still going strong but aren’t what they were when they began”, then of course I agree.

  • kamin@lemmy.kghorvath.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    We’ve reached the end of the VC-funded golden age where they are all now demanding a return on their investment, hence why the screws are now all getting tightened.

    • omarciddo@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m honestly surprised it even got this far. It was just common sense to me, even a decade ago, that companies that burned through VC cash and tried building up user bases with little regard for actual profitability couldn’t possibly keep it up forever.

  • empireOfLove@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    All these websites have almost always been net cash flow negative. They bleed venture capital to provide a service below cost in order to build a user base.

    The problem now is interest rates have spiked. Rates have been basically zilch for much of the internet’s history over the past 20+ years, so sites could actually operate for quite some time on super cheap debt that they almost never had to repay. And venture capital firms would just keep pouring money into the “next best thing”.

    Now that debt is rapidly becoming much more expensive to maintain, and those VC investors want their chunk of the pie back in their pockets. And they are going to extract it from every single one of these centralized services by whatever force is necessary. It’s only just getting started, you watch.

  • lvxferre@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    They saw Lemmy becoming successful, corporate mistook Lemmy with Lemmings, and decided to go out Lemmings style.

    …jokes aside, Cory Doctorow has a great text about that, called “Tiktok’s enshittification”. It’s a four-steps process:

    1. The platform is good for its users.
    2. The platform abuses the users, to be good for its business customers.
    3. The platform abuses the business customers, to claw back all value for itself.
    4. The platform dies.

    In my opinion it’s also the result of management being disconnected from the platform that it manages, and not knowing fully the implications of their own decisions.

  • rnd@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Some people have come up with the word “enshittification” to describe the basic cycle of modern web services.

    The cycle consists of three parts:

    1. You make the service that attracts new users by providing what they want. Often you do that at a loss, because your goal is to gain a big enough userbase for steps 2 and 3.
    2. Once there’s enough users, you shift to attracting commercial interests instead – vendors if you’re running a store, advertisers or celebrities or other “big clients” if you’re a social network, etc.
    3. Once both users and commercial interests are hooked, you can start tightening all the rules and switching completely to profiting yourself and your shareholders.
  • Space Sloth@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The twitter thing is sad, but honestly not a huge deal. I rarely used it anyhow.

    The reddit thing is depressing, since I’ve been a huge supporter and user of Apollo for many years. It feels like getting stepped on and I feel for the developer Christian Selig who devoted so much time and energy to the app.

    I hope nothing happens to Twitch in the way that Twitter and Reddit have though, the small time streamers I follow and support won’t survive a thing like that.

    • dogmuffins@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think it’s an important lesson in impermanence.

      The net will always have good bits and bad bits, but they won’t always stay the same.

    • malcolm_miller@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Reddit has so many small communities that the people in charge have absolutely no care for. I hope one of these services takes hold as a clear Reddit replacement so that they can be built back up.

      • foopo666@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I get the impression that owners of large servers aren’t too interested in the growth from Reddit. I think some post even said that using “Reddit refugee” as a reason for application for an account is gonna get you rejected.

  • Leigh@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s not just tech companies like Reddit and Twitter, it seems like it’s most companies. Ever since the COVID lockdowns prices have been going through the roof, you get less for what you pay for, they’re laying off workers, and all while raking in record profits while also crying about how no one wants to work and how they can’t afford anything because of the economy. I’ve never been more cynical about companies than I have been the last year.

    • LemmyAtem@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t speak for everyone obviously, but to piggy-back on your comment a little, I personally have found myself looking inward/smaller more because of some of the things you referenced. “you get less for what you pay for” - 100% agree, so I pay for less, and try to find value more. I used to buy coffee out nearly every day, now I rarely do. We (wife and I) rarely eat out because it’s exorbitantly expensive. We used to love going to breweries and just putzing around new places, but now we meet up with friends and visit their homes more. I feel like with everything being both expensive and polarizing in some way, I’d just rather spend more time with my friends and loved ones, and not worry about how much i’m expected to tip on this beer that is $4 more than it used to be!

      • Leigh@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Going out especially is insane. I’m not terribly far off from Hartford, CT, and no matter where we go, if my wife and I go out just for two drinks total, one for each of us, we’re not walking out of there without spending less than $25 or even $30. That’s just fucking wild to me. If we want to have dinner–two mains, one shared app, one drink each–we’re looking at at least $100 to $120, and that’s just to any random place, not a high-end eatery or anything. And every single place will hand you a little Square thing or whatever with tip suggestions that start at 18% and go up to 25%.

        • LemmyAtem@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          100% feel you. Fortunately my wife LOVES to cook (no sarcasm, it’s literally her favorite hobby, I am one lucky bastard), Craft beer/liquor has never been more accessible, and I am pretty decent at cold brewing my own coffee! For now, most the unnecessary spending can be avoided completely and I’m not sad about it.

          • marco@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I just bought myself two pastries, thinking that’s cheaper than getting lunch. Each one was $7.

            $7.00 Hot Bites
            $7.75 Canadian Bacon Cheese
            
            Purchase Subtotal $14.75
            Sales Tax (10%) $1.48
            Tip $2.43
            Total $18.66
            
            

            Welcome to Seattle.