Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Kyiv would like to end the war with Russia next year through “diplomatic means” as both countries prepare for President-elect Donald Trump’s return to the White House.

In an interview with the Ukrainian media outlet Suspilne, Zelenskyy said he is certain that the war will end “sooner” than it otherwise would have once Mr. Trump becomes president.

The prospect of Trump returning to power in the United States next year has raised questions about the future of the conflict, as the Republican has been critical of U.S. military aid to Kyiv.

Zelenskyy said that Ukraine “must do everything so that this war ends next year, ends through diplomatic means.”

Archive link

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    The best reason to end any war is to ask how everyone can just stop killing one another.

    This is modern day civilization, not the barbarian hordes of Europe 1500 years ago.

    We have a choice to act civilized or like our ignorant ancestors from thousands of years ago.

        • tiredturtle@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          And let’s not forget Russia’s support from that batch. This war is just another money scheme

          • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            True. DC is not an irradiated pile of ruble because of the theater of permawar that Russia eventually wins is the script. US loses all wars because victory ends a war, and brings oil prices back down.

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      War is a necessity as long as Imperialism remains the dominant contradiction in the world, we need to move beyond Capitalism to move beyond war.

          • Cryan24@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Why should my lazy neighbour get the same as me when I work harder or smarter? There in lies the problem with pure socialism… socialised democracy ( i.e. capitalism with based services for all) is the only palletable stance in that direction.

            • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              20 hours ago

              Wow. Immediately going to the myth of laziness right from the get go.

              You’re wrapped in arrogance armor, placed there by propagandists. It makes you feel well intentioned, principled, correct, and most importantly, educated. The problem is that the propagandists ensured you were ignorant and dogmatic. Now you have the terrible curse of being ignorant and dogmatic but believing you’re knowledgeable and principled.

              Just study more history. Read the people that you’re scared of like Marx, Engels, Lenin, Stalin, Mao. Just read more and seek after knowledge that contradicts your upbringing. Most Western communists were raised on the same propaganda you were. We all managed to defeat our training by learning more about what’s really been happening for the last 500 years and unlearning the lies we were raised with.

              You can do it, too.

            • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              1 day ago

              That’s not what Socialism is, or even Communism. In every existing Socialist state, people have gotten higher or lower pay for different levels of intensity or skill. If getting paid the same is “the problem with pure socialism” then it sounds like it’s all cleared up!

              Secondly, Social Democracy still relies on Capitalism, which necessarily moves in the direction of increased disparity and centralization of power in fewer and fewer hands. Moreover, as companies spread internationally, Capitalism turns to Imperialism, whereby workers in the Global South are paid a fraction of the wages a worker in the Global North would be paid. This form of hyper-exploitation for super-profits results in dramatically unequal exchange and underdevelopment. Socialism is the way forward, beyond this system of exploitation and eventual collapse.

              I really recommend you give at least the first section of my reading list a try.