And I’m being serious. I feel like there might be an argument there, I just don’t understand it. Can someone please “steelman” that argument for me?

  • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    8 days ago

    You actively participate in the murder of people.

    If enough people did not participate the murder would simply not happen.

    • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      So… Palestine is safe now? Not voting or voting Trump leads to people not being murdered?

      I’m pretty sure that’s not what’s going to happen, and I wish I was wrong.

    • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Speaking as an engineer, I’ve contributed to the murder of more people than I can count.

      Speaking as someone who has purchased goods on Amazon and at Walmart, I’ve contributed to the murder of more people than I can count.

      We all kill people. Every single person in this thread has contributed to and benefited from death of another. You drive over a bridge, you benefit from the dead. You live in any extant country, you have benefited from murder. Our entire society is built on the lifelong suffering and deaths of millions, a tiny sliver of guilt at a time.

      Electing Kamala is roughly the same level of moral failure.

      Electing trump is giving an unlocked gun and 1000 rounds to a 7 year old with anger problems. The moral failure is several order of magnitude higher.

    • KombatWombat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      You are still participating by choosing to be a bystander to injustice. Abstaining when you can support something less bad only says to others that you do not care how bad it gets.