bishbosh@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoMatrix 2.0 Is Here!matrix.orgexternal-linkmessage-square61fedilinkarrow-up1437arrow-down16cross-posted to: fediverse@lemmy.worldmatrix@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1431arrow-down1external-linkMatrix 2.0 Is Here!matrix.orgbishbosh@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square61fedilinkcross-posted to: fediverse@lemmy.worldmatrix@lemmy.ml
minus-squareipkpjersi@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up28·2 days agoUX is very difficult, unfortunately, especially for open-source projects where the contributors are usually programmers and not so much UX/product managers.
minus-squaremin_fapper@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 day agoYeah, but repeated “This message cannot be decrypted” breaks its primary function as a chat app. It’s getting harder and harder to disable their broken end to end encryption by default too.
minus-squarerimjob_rainer@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·2 days agoLook at the telegram client, which is open source and has the best UX for a messenger I know
minus-squaresem@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down1·2 days agoIsn’t telegram a for-profit company?
minus-squarerimjob_rainer@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down2·1 day agoThe telegram apps are open source
UX is very difficult, unfortunately, especially for open-source projects where the contributors are usually programmers and not so much UX/product managers.
Yeah, but repeated “This message cannot be decrypted” breaks its primary function as a chat app.
It’s getting harder and harder to disable their broken end to end encryption by default too.
Look at the telegram client, which is open source and has the best UX for a messenger I know
Isn’t telegram a for-profit company?
The telegram apps are open source