The FBI sleeps when libraries burn

    • huginn@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      65
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      1 day ago

      This guy is outing the archive for terrible security posture by bringing attention to it because they received disclosures and did not fix them.

      Don’t get shit twisted - he’s the hero here. IA fucked up and has been vulnerable to manipulation by any number of corporate or national actors this entire time.

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        If they were really “the hero”, they’d follow the bare minimum of responsible disclosure best practices, and allow 90 days between privately alerting them of the issue and going public with it. Two weeks is absurd.

      • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        56
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        If this was genuinely done out of love I could understand but due to the legal battles the internet archive is currently being dragged through, I harbor suspicion of their intent.

        • huginn@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          There’s never certainty when talking about hackers…

          That’s verbatim the content of the email and the email hack does not appear to be malicious (unlike the ddos or the password breach)

          It’s more likely that this is 3 different groups than it is a single group.

    • apotheotic (she/her)@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      I mean this person seems to be not doing it maliciously. As they say, if it wasn’t them, it would be someone else. Pushing archive to improve their security is great for everyone. As long as this person doesn’t do anything actually malicious, they’re in the clear as far as I’m concerned.

  • jwiggler@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    195
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    Hackers acting as if they’re doing a public service by bringing down a free publicly accessible tool is a new level of assbackwardness.

    If the goal really was to force IA to increase their security, they would’ve tried to consult with them. This is more about notoriety and chaos and the hackers have no moral ground to stand on.

    • zante@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      77
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah look at me flexing on and underfunded non profit.

      Not at all hackers are criminals, but many are idiots.

    • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      was that their stated reason for attacking the internet archive?

      to bring awareness to the security breaches?

      little fucks.

      “I stole your wallet because pockets are so vulnerable. I’m helping.”

    • umbrella@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      22 hours ago

      those hackers are probably paid by the corporations wanting to bring it down

      • UnrepententProcrastinator@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        As much as I probably ideologically stand with you, let’s not confirmation bias ourselves into a belief we have no evidence for.

    • switchboard_pete@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 day ago

      Hackers acting as if they’re doing a public service by bringing down a free publicly accessible tool is a new level of assbackwardness.

      are the zendesk hackers the same as the ones who brought down the website initially?

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Their emotional maturity is close to zero.

      They go after internet archive, such a lame move.

  • orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    This strikes me as state-funded or state adjacent hacking. Kind of like how the destruction of Twitter eliminated a source of on-the-ground, 24/7 information for the working class on all of the events our governments would prefer we not see so that their propaganda can be produced more lazily. Destroying the Internet Archive acts as another hindrance to the working class when it comes to staying informed and enriched.

    • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Because they’re corporate bootlickers, paid or otherwise.

      Look at the people that participate in “Hacker News.” corporate-art bootlicker

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Hey, instead of picking on that little kid, why don’t you go harass that huge bodybuilder guy with all the knives attached to his belt?

  • Arcturus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    The FBI sleeps when libraries burn

    This dumbass is probably being paid by them in the first place lol

  • BonerMan@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    Doesn’t seem to be ill intended, not a good way to point out a problem, but the problem is there.