• LibertyLizard@slrpnk.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I agree that they overstated their point there. But regardless, I think it’s fair to say that any differences between men and women in these sports are fairly small, so I don’t think it changes the overall conclusion.

    • dank@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      The men’s world record marathon time is 9% faster than the women’s. That’s significant. The male runner would finish over two miles ahead of the female runner.

      • flerp@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Women were first allowed to compete in marathons in 1972. In 1972 the men’s record was 2:10:30. The current record is 2:00:35 which is about an 8% difference. Pretty close to the difference between men and women currently.

        The first women’s record was 3:40:22 and the current women’s record is 2:11:53.11 which is 40% faster.

        Once funding for women’s athletics reaches parity and once girls are encouraged into athletics as much as boys, then we will see if the ladies catch up. So far they’re doing a pretty good job catching up, and you can’t look at one current window in time and say you have the answer, you need to look at trends.

        • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          And that’s what people miss when quoting sports statistics. They confuse culture with biology. We live in a society that imparts certain roles based on gender. Men are encouraged to exercise and run more from a young age than women are. In an egalitarian society, that disparity wouldn’t exist. We really can’t say how things would play out. That’s why studies of paleolithic skeletons are a much better tool than just navel-gazing based on modern sports. Those statistics cannot be separated from our current society. Instead of just speculating, we can look at the actual skeletons of paleolithic people, which this article discusses. These skeletons record a record of the kinds of lives these people lived. There’s no need to speculate; we can ask these people directly how they lived.

      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I wouldn’t consider 9% to be that large in this context. Certainly a difference that would be overshadowed by individual variation.

        Even if we assume women are physiologically 9% slower at persistence hunting (which that statistic is far from proving) it still suggests they could and likely were successful at it, albeit maybe not the very best.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        How many marathons are run in a weaving path on uneven ground full of underbrush while trying to keep up with an animal that could potentially go in any direction at any time in the hopes that it will get tired before you do?

        Because otherwise this marathon measurement is silly.