• boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Their hardware requirements are pretty clear. Samsung is the only one with comparably secure devices, but they use nonstandard tools like Odin and lock down many security features to the stock OS only.

    Other companies are supposedly not making anything as secure.

    https://grapheneos.org/faq#future-devices

    Also, only Google can really ship updates that quickly and fully, as Android is literally their OS. They are also a huge company, so yeah they have way more resources than a random other company you might prefer.

    Example Fairphone, which has horrible update schedules

    • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I am aware of the shortcomings of my choice.

      But my priority is to not give a cent to Google: what am I supposed to do then?

      I argue that GrapheneOS gives Pixel phones more value, thereby supporting Google. That is not great.

      • communism@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 months ago

        If your priority is to not give a cent to Google then don’t use GrapheneOS. There are other degoogled OSes for people whose priority is that. If your priority is security then you’d be willing to sacrifice on avoiding anything Google by getting GrapheneOS.

        In any case, technically if you wanted to avoid anything primarily made by Google you’d have a Linux phone. The degoogled Android OSes are still based on Google’s open-source code.

        • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          if you wanted to avoid anything primarily made by Google you’d have a Linux phone

          That’s true.

          Unfortunately that’s not possible: I live in a country that delegates secure authentication to banks, and banks only supply 2FA apps that work in Android or iOS. If I had a Linux phone, I’d still need another phone with Android just for the purpose of banking, interacting with social services, logging in my work hours, getting notifications from the post office…

          That’s the misery of Android: Google is such a pervasive monopoly that even if you want a fully deGoogled OS, the basis of it has to be 95% made by Google anyway because the rest of society goes along and reinforces their monopoly. And at some point, even someone like me has to make compromises to simply live normally.

          I would gladly buy a Linux phone and I’d even put up with their quirks (I tried one once so I know they’re not as polished an experience as Android). But I am also a practocal man and it’s just not an option.

          • communism@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 months ago

            I’m sorry to hear that, but also, what does that mean for people in your country who don’t have smartphones? I know that sometimes people aren’t allowed to own smartphones (refugees, or sometimes imposed on a defendant as part of criminal proceedings)—if you don’t own a smartphone can you just not participate in society there?

            Tbh when I’ve been required to install some kind of dodgy proprietary app that doesn’t work well with GrapheneOS I just tell them I don’t have a smartphone and they seem to be fine with that and offer me a “low-tech” alternative for whatever it is (usually some kind of 2FA app). It’s concerning when important things are inaccessible to people without a smartphone, because of course that’s the baseline for things being accessible for everyone regardless of their phone situation, e.g. people with degoogled phones etc.

        • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          I also dont think you give Google a lot of money when just leeching on their services with lots of fake accounts.

          I use Youtube with adblock / custom apps since 6 years or something, so that should be equal to the market value I gave their phones on the used market

      • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        The phones are good. Yes it is a lot of money, and they do silly stuff with these phones, like removing everything or using glass everywhere

        I just buy used. Way cheaper, never gonna pay more than for my Laptop

      • StormWalker@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        It is funny, pixel phones gaining popularity due to de-googling. Something seems very wrong with that haha

    • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Example Fairphone, which has horrible update schedules

      Fairphone’s release schedule and Calix’ release schedules are two different things. CalyxOS is updated less often than GrapheneOS for sure, but it’s updated a lot more often than Fairphone OS.