• Ukraine appears to be targeting Russian attempts to build temporary bridges in Kursk.
  • This comes after 3 permanent bridges were reportedly destroyed by Ukraine.
  • Ukraine looks to be trying to cut off Russian forces in the region.
  • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Ok then, fighter-bombers or more artillery. If the bridge is in range of Ukrainian drones, then the drone base station is in range of counter fire.

    • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think you’re overestimating the staging and emplacement for a drone attack of these types. They don’t need a static “drone base station.”

      • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Like I said, I’m not an expert but I think big drones that can take down a bridge aren’t piloted by two dudes in a bush.

        • Johanno@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          They are probably controlled by one dude in a bush.

          Of course you need a base for preparation, but you can drive out to the front and start the drone there.

    • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      The currently most viable counter to artillery in Ukraine today appears to be either fpv drones, which have relatively short range and limited payloads, or counter-battery radar + artillery, which exposes your artillery by putting it in range of enemy artillery.

      Ukraine typically has more accurate artillery than Russia, and seems to win more artillery duels, but of course still has an issue because of Russias huge volume of guns.

      Targeting the drone operators is definitely something both sides do- they were considered priority targets last time I heard someone mention it. The issue, as someone else pointed out, is locating and hitting a small, highly mobile person or group that can operate from behind cover and concealment. That turns out to be pretty hard. Just consider that an infantryman’s primary survival strategy is “stay hidden when you can, covered when you can, and move as fast as possible when exposed”, and that drone operators are doing exactly that, while also not needing to stick their head out to be effective.