• unconsciousvoidling@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yea none of us are going to see the benefits. Tired of seeing articles of scientific advancement that I know will never trickle down to us peasants.

    • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Our clinics are already using ai to clean up MRI images for easier and higher quality reads. We use ai on our cath lab table to provide a less noisy image at a much lower rad dose.

        • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          It’s not diagnosing, which is good imho. It’s just being used to remove noise and artifacts from the images on the scan. This means the MRI is clearer for the reading physician and ordering surgeon in the case of the MRI and that the cardiologist can use less radiation during the procedure yet get the same quality image in the lab.

          I’m still wary of using it to diagnose in basically any scenario because of the salience and danger that both false negatives and false positives threaten.

    • Tja@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      … they said, typing on a tiny silicon rectangle with access to the whole of humanity’s knowledge and that fits in their pocket…