• P1r4nha@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Although the practicality is questionable, I think the takeaway is that we will have to rethink mobility and dense environments with good cycling infrastructure will be the most sustainable ones. Public transportation which is great too, also requires a certain density to be feasible.

    • Yabai@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The practicality isn’t questionable.

      Of course there are outliers and places/people it wouldn’t work for but the vast majority should be absolutely fine.

      • Hirom@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Even if it’s not practical right away, that’s just a reason to vote to put people in charge who would make it practical and convenient.

        It’s also possible to join a non-profit that engage with the public and local governments to make bicycle-friendly infrastructure happen.

        • derelict@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not only vote, but get involved in local politics. A lot of transportation and zoning issues have real things happening at the local levels where a single individual can make a difference

      • rigo@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is questionable though in most states in the US atleast. Not sure how someone who lives a 20 minute drive from the nearest town in the middle of nowhere is supposed to ride a bike around. The whole world isn’t urbanized

          • rigo@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yep, I’m not debating that point. I’m 100% in favor of doing that. I’m asking about solutions for everyone else. This debate is usually framed as “all we need to do is” when that isn’t the case for everywhere or everyone. Just diving into it a little bit more.

            • anji@lemmy.anji.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah a solution for the remaining 20% would be great, but we (the US) are not even addressing the urban 80%. I live in the SF Bay Area. It’s incredibly dense here, yet riding a bike is impossible/suicidal. It takes me 20 minutes to get to work by car, but 2 hours by bus. This needs to be fixed first before worrying about small town Montana.

              • rigo@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yep yep, again. Agreed on all counts but that isn’t what the original comments or the article was about. Which is why I brought it up in the first place. I think it’s generally agreed that the more urbanized places would need revamping first. I’m just specifically asking about ideas in rural areas because that’s where I’m from.

                • ebike_enjoyer@beehaw.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  To be completely honest, if you’re living somewhere where this doesn’t apply, I wouldn’t worry about it. There are things people in rural areas can (theoretically, depending on which rural area) do to curb their carbon footprint (consuming local agriculture comes to mind) and there are, I’m sure, people working on solving this issue for rural areas. The problem here I think is in this “all or nothing” mindset. As @anji@lemmy.anji.nl mentioned, this is a viable solution theoretically for nearly 80% of those living in one of the least climate friendly nations out there. This is also a viable solution for many (most?) countries, as most people live in cities. This is a solution for those people. For rural people, we will need different solutions. That’s all.

                  • rigo@lemmy.one
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    100% and I absolutely get that aspect. My original post was more about trying to find out what those rural solutions are since everyone commenting did keep saying things along the line of “all we need to do is __________”.

                    Not debating the effectiveness of what they’re suggesting, but also I’m allowed to ask what the other ideas are for those of us who are outside of the urban areas lol.

        • Yabai@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re right that currently it’s hard many places in the US thanks to suburbs, terrible zoning, car focused laws and so on.
          But it’s not like biking itself is the issue here, it’s that you are in dire need of better infrastructure, zoning, public transport and laws.

          • rigo@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Again this is semantics. But this isn’t true. Look at the entire state of WV or any state that is mountainous. Unless magically millions of people get in much better shape there isn’t an obvious solution. I’m all for better infrastructure and public transport.

        • Obi@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Then different solutions can be put in place in these places and/or you start with cities and figure out the country side later.

          I think the bigger issue you have in the US is the sprawled neighbourhoods, I’m not sure how you can get back from that, maybe recreate small centers in the middle of them.

          • rigo@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            What are the different solutions? Genuinely asking. Seems like a large aspect to skip since it represents the majority of the US LOL

            • trident_burger@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Provide regularly scheduled public transportation that feeds into denser urban areas. Make it easy to bike in denser urban areas.

              • rigo@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                So to provide regularly scheduled public transportation we would need to build out rail infrastructure to country areas? I suppose a park and ride system would be effective but what would still require a mass buildout.

                I’m thinking of areas like this one I attached. The nearest cities are 1hr drive from most towns, the cities are all small-midsized so don’t have that many jobs (proportionally) in the first place. The solution is to put train stations in every town? Every other town? Then the cities themselves would need to build out rail infrastructure because Albany and Syracuse have very little in the way of public transportation.

                Genuinely asking, not trying to come across as snarky. This is actually a middle-ground example. I could show you a map of WV or Western PA if you really want to see rural.

                • trident_burger@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I mean…yes? Absolutely, improve rail infrastructure in Albany and Syracuse. Build park and rides at places that feed into that improved system. Improve bus service (or train? Looks like there are already tracks in many places) along higway corridors with moderately sized communities.

                  Can counties or cities currently afford this without sacrificing something? No.

                  Would the federal government and states need to spend hundreds of billions, if not trillions, over several decades to make happen? Yes.

                  • rigo@lemmy.one
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Yeah the track system is largely in place (not sure if freight or passenger). I’m not trying to argue lol. I’m just asking questions. So in your world there would be a mass spiderweb of intersecting trains that sprawls out to everywhere (obviously a kind of park and ride situation) and that would feed into the cities or other communities.

                    Makes me think about the whole idea of the Green New Deal that Sanders was talking about when he ran the first time. Get a giant workforce of people out there building railways and stations. Would be interesting to see for sure.

            • Kapitel42@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              A part of the problem are zoning and parking space laws preventing businesses to open up where people live. If you cant be close to residential areas and have to have an insane number of parking spaces it is hard to operate a shop in small towns.

              • rigo@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                This, and also just the mass commercialization of everything. The majority of towns don’t have small businesses any more, it’s all chains…or they drive to the nearest Walmart. There was a good article in the NYtimes recently about this and how dollar generals are basically taking over in rural communities. There aren’t enough people in these towns to support a diverse set of businesses, so the businesses shut down and a Dollar General moves in because it covers most basic needs.

            • Obi@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              For sure for sure, not saying it’s easy! Different solutions include public transports (trains, buses, etc), electric bikes + appropriate paths, electric/hydrogen vehicles, car pooling, offsetting emissions some other way, etc etc.

              It’s also about having towns and villages that are “self-sufficient” to a degree where you don’t need to drive to the huge mall or whatever on the regular, and can just pick up the groceries for tonight’s dinner on foot/bike (and yes that means having smaller supermarkets with less choice, but they’re closer! It’s great).

              Truthfully even in the Netherlands (where I live) once you get to the countryside every household has a car as well, we do too, living in a rural area. But we can still go do our grocery shopping, and most other things on foot/bike. The car is still necessary for work and getting to some other places though.

              And that’s also mainly because we don’t have a train station here and my work takes me to random addresses daily with heavy equipment.

              Anyway another part of my point was that if you don’t have a good solution for countrysides, then that shouldn’t stop y’all from moving forward with solutions in city centers and suburban areas.