Currently on Lemmy, when a comment is deleted by its creator, all of the replies to that comment become “hidden”. If I know who replied, and I go to their profile, I can still see the replies. The count of the number of comments indicated next to the post also includes the “hidden” replies. However, the replies to the deleted comment do not appear in the post. On Reddit, if a comment is deleted by its creator, it remains in the post with comment deleted by creator or something like that, and all of the replies to thatcomment remain visible in the post. Is there a way to do this on Lemmy?

  • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think if a comment is deleted, replies should remain hidden. I’d say the current behavior is more beneficial, despite the obvious tradeoff.

    While sometimes there can be some helpful information in replies to deleted posts or comments, the vast, vast majority of those kinds of threads are just flamewars and arguing, then new people joining the battle later on and more arguing and flamewars happen. Lemmy doesn’t need more of that. If there was some question answered in one of those deleted replies, someone else can just ask that question again as a post, its not the end of the world.

    Besides, a thread with a lot of deleted comments is an awful reading experience. If you ever went to Reddit and their main “science” subreddit, you better have all the discussion you can in the first 15 minutes of the post, because after that they just became a [removed] graveyard, regardless of what was said.

    • Otter@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      While sometimes there can be some helpful information in replies to deleted posts or comments, the vast, vast majority of those kinds of threads are just flamewars and arguing

      This really depends on the subreddit/community

      Some people like to delete their comments for privacy, because they want to move instances, etc. It doesn’t make sense to have that remove entire chains of comments with it. I also don’t think people intend for that to happen when deleting comments.

      Mods should have a “nuke thread” button to autoremove all child comments when there’s a mess like you said. Users shouldn’t have that ability, even if they intended for that in the first place

      • redpen@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        This was the reason for this post. It has happened to me quite a few times already. When I take a bunch of time to make a well-thought-out reply and link a bunch of references in a discussion, I don’t want all that effort to effectively disappear when the original commentor just decides they are embarrassed or don’t want to continue and just nukes the thread.

        Edit: typos

    • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The downside of the idea of removing all child comments.

      Is one person can remove an entire chain of comments just be deleting theirs.

      • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        While true, I don’t think this would happen as often as you might think.

        For example, lets say some nefarious actor starts some comment thread and later decides to delete their comment “to own the Libs” or whatever they say now. That entire threads responses were meaningless. They were argumentation and flamefighting. If the comment information was incorrect, removing it as a deleted comment is more beneficial than leaving it up for others to read and ignore the context.

        Lets say someone decides to delete their entire account and comment history. Reading responses are going to be difficult to understand the context. Most of the time these responses are to specific issues or comments, not typically a general answer, as general answers are usually top level comments. In this case, if someone later has the same question, it can be answered again later when that person asks. There may be more updated information between then and the hidden reply that changes the information, and there is no need to retain outdated answers to a question.

        • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Personal view.

          If I make a comment, only the mod and myself should be able to remove it.

          It should not be up to a user I reply to if my comment should be visible.

        • Otter@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          But why force that deletion instead of letting people choose if something is outdated/irrelevant/confusing? It doesn’t cause any harm to leave up the information in case it helps.

          If a user doesn’t like it, they can just skip threads with deleted comments, or enable that setting themselves (depending on the frontend)

    • freamon@endlesstalk.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s interesting that all the replies (so far) are to you, rather than OP, because the behaviour of Lemmy is more interesting than just answering ‘No’ about their original query. So you could nuke everything in this post if your wanted to.

      The ‘obvious trade-off’ part doesn’t acknowledge how much of social media engagement is driven by the urge to correct someone. So I think it’s something to be mindful of: if you say something wrong, and someone corrects you, then your choices should be: leave it be; strikethrough your text; or edit it to literally say “[removed]”, which are all better options than deleting it.

      To give an example - from when I commented on an eerie Terrible Real Estate Photo with a oddly-placed chair in it:

      The replies to me - that it’s an optical illusion, and that the sockets are part of building regs, have value on their own, and shouldn’t disappear just because I might get embarrassed by my comment.

    • Despair@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are lots of reasons for for wanting to delete comments without wanting to delete any replies.

      For example in this comment, I bring up the use of macros as a solution to fix a mouse issue. If someone brought up a point that this software was against the games TOS, I would want my comment removed as fast as possible because I view my comment as potentially harmful (and from context, it would have been obvious what the deleted comment would have contained). If there were other replies giving advice on how to solder (one of the other solutions I give), I would want those replies to remain visible to anyone else viewing the post. Some people, like me, might not have been aware that deleting a comment would remove all other replies, I’ve never seen a warning message that this would happen when deleting something.

      Deleting the comment on mobile instead of editing out bad information is also a lot more likely because it’s a “one button fix”, and a lot more convenient than trying to edit the post (some apps don’t render markdown correctly, and may not display strikethrough text). With the above example, quicky deleting my comment would have been an appropriate way to remove harmful advice, and a reply warning about the use of macros and advice on how to solder would still be helpful without the context of the original comment they were replying to.