• mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Hot sauces should be required by law to list their Scoville range (SHU) on their packaging.

    • don@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      4 months ago

      Fuckin facts, yo, I’m tired of searching up the sauce to try to get a gauge of wherever the fuck the sauce actually is, as opposed to its marketing wank wanting to convince me I’m chowing down on neutron star, despite it really being around room temp unflavored jello.

    • TehBamski@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      4 months ago

      100% agree. I want to know whether I’m increasing, decreasing, or maintaining my heat threshold.

  • Contramuffin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Parents’ jobs aren’t to protect their kids. It’s to make sure that their kids are sufficiently prepared for the world when the kids grow up.

    There seems to be this rising trend of parents being overprotective of their children, even to the point of having parental controls enabled for children even as old as the late teens. My impression has always been that these children are too sheltered for their age.

    I grew up in the “age of internet anarchism,” where goatse was just considered a harmless prank to share with your friends and liveleaks was openly shared. Probably not the best way of growing up, to be fair, but I think we’ve swung so hard into the opposite direction that a lot of these children, I feel, are living in their own little bubbles.

    To some degree, it honestly makes sense to me why the younger generation nowadays is so willing to post their lives on the internet. When that’s the only thing you can do on the internet, that’s what you’ll do

    • RozhkiNozhki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I have recently learned that the new helicopter parent type is the snowplow parent - these are the ones that not only shield their kids from the world, but also fully manage their lives for them. I work for the University of California and seeing how absolutely helpless these kids are is scary.

      • Contramuffin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m in the UC system as well. It’s both concerning and amusing how much college students nowadays go to their parents for permission on minor things. I get it, to some degree. Respect for your parents and all that. But some degree of autonomy would be helpful at that age

        • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          4 months ago

          If you’ve spent any amount of time among people who went to / are in college in their early 20s, and people who were working in their late teens and early twenties, it becomes clear that college arranges for the students to have a managed-for-them life to a degree that I actually think is severely harmful to them. It’s basically a big day care. Education is fuckin fantastic, I’m not saying it’s not, but the nature of the way your life is organized within it to me I think is very bad for people.

          Like yes you know integrals, very good, but e.g. I spoke to a guy who had not paid his phone bill for months, who somehow still had phone service but was genuinely very confused about how the bills he was getting now could have gotten as high as they were. No matter how many times I tried to explain to him, I couldn’t get it across. I finally just gave up the endeavor.

          • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            Part of the issue with the value of college isn’t that it educated, but that it acted like an ordeal to overcome and filtered out people who didn’t have the makings of being a leader. Not all of that is due to educational ability.

    • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Parents jobs arent to protect their kids

      I get you don’t mean this so broadly but you lose all nuance with this statement.

      Protect them from every minor mistake or risk that could ever possibly happen, and smothering them? Sure.

      Someone about to stab your kid? Protect them from predators? Protect them from various risks and hazards in life which every parent should be teaching them?

      • dont get into strangers cars
      • dont let strangers into the house
      • look both ways when crossing the road
      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        It wasn’t the comment that lacked nuance; just your reading.

        All the stuff you added went without saying.

        • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Parents jobs arent to protect their kids.

          What the fuck else does that mean? If you want to believe you can read minds and assume what a person is talking about, whatever.

          But if someone makes a statement, maybe take it at face value rather than “ah yes they must mean something else”

          fucking idiot

          • intensely_human@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            I’m pretty autistic, so you’re not allowed to write this off as “people using magic communication I can’t understand because I’m smart” or whatever your model of the current situation is.

            When a person says it is not a parent’s job to protect their kids, you already know what it means. It’s right there in your three bullet point.

            • dont get into strangers cars
            • dont let strangers into the house
            • look both ways when crossing the road

            If a parent’s job were protecting their kids, these would read:

            • Don’t let your kids near roads or cars
            • Don’t give your kids control over the door
            • Don’t let your kids cross roads

            Like, if I was given care of a dog for a week while their owners went on vacation, and my job were to “protect the dog”, I wouldn’t be putting the dog in any of the situations where its own choices were the source of its safety.

            Are you ready to stop pretending that you don’t see?

            • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              The first line of my reply literally says I dont think this is what you mean, BUT …. I very clearly stated I assume that isnt exactly what the commenter meant. The rest of my comment is to clarify what the poster defined as “protection”.

              If someone came up to me and asked protect something, contextually yes obviously I understand that.

              That isnt the situation here. The comment chain is someone with a “hot take” on what “parents protecting children” means. It being a hot take I feel it is completely valid to put aside any assumption that the commenter is talking about “well obviously I mean protect them from x y z”. Because its a potentially unpopular hot take. It’s not a common idea in society.

              Unless you can read minds it is very possible this commenter meant it literally. IE how kids are raised in the film 300. “Heres a stick. go fight a wolf kid”.

              Im not writing it off. I assumed what they meant but followed up for clarification. Did you just expect replies to be “agree” or “disagree” with zero further discussion?

    • AchtungDrempels@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 months ago

      I thought you’d be talking about letting kids climb up high into trees, going into the city on their own, let them hang out at the skatepark without supervision, stuff like that.

      But no, it’s about computers and kids not being able to see goatse. Lol. That’s lemmy i guess.

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      On the other hand I owe my career in IT to learning how to bypass the parental controls my parents set up and cover my tracks. That got me started in computers really early.

  • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    If you let your cat outside in the Americas (or anywhere cats haven’t lived for thousands of years) unsupervised I’m going to assume one of the following is true: you don’t care if your cat dies, and/or you don’t care about wildlife. Even if you live in a place with zero predators, why the hell are you trusting a CAT with road safety?

    Saying this as someone who grew up with parents that let our cats live (and die, a lot) that way. And as someone who has seen two friends lose cats to coyotes in the past year. And also interrupted an attack on someone’s pet by a coyote. It’s been a bad fucking year here for coyotes.

      • dustycups@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I feel like this is slowly changing (based on no real evidence).

        At least some councils are CATching up.

        • boogetyboo@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          The new suburbs where I am are cat containment areas so that’s something. But I’m in an older suburb. Where all the wildlife is quite established. And I keep finding lizards and parrots ripped apart. My home cameras pick up the cats that visit all night.

    • Dem Bosain@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      Plus, my (indoor) cat can’t help but have a loud, boisterous conversation with any cat that wanders through my yard. Usually at 2am while I’m trying to sleep.

    • morrowind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      My cats were born an outdoor cat and I’d rather they touched some grass and lived an actual life rather than be stuck inside all day even if they die earlier. I’m sure they would too.

      Wildlife argument is valid though. They kill some good (rats, mice), but I can’t justify them killing birds and lizards.

    • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Thank you for pointing out that this is only an issue for places where wild cats have been non-native.

  • reversebananimals@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    4 months ago

    If your political opinion begins with “why don’t we just…” then its a bad political opinion.

    If we could just, we would have already just. If you think you’re the only one with the capacity to see a simple answer - newsflash, you’re not a political genius. Its you who doesn’t understand the complexity of the problem.

    • boogetyboo@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      4 months ago

      My partner lacked political engagement until his 30s for reasons so he occasionally has these hot takes. But he expresses them to me and I do feel bad because he’s not coming at it from an arrogant perspective. It’s ignorance, some naivete and also exasperation at a whole lot of shit things.

      I have to gently explain to him why XYZ isn’t that simple or black and white, or why his idea doesn’t work - and the answer to that, 9 times out of 10, is ‘because money/rich people/greed/lobbyists/nimbyism’.

      I’m just slowly chipping away at his innocence and it feels bad.

      • reversebananimals@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 months ago

        Its great that you’re helping to inform him! I have found the people who know the most about politics and global issues tend to talk less and listen more.

        • boogetyboo@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          4 months ago

          My responses to him are always prefaced with a big sigh. Because whatever I’m about to tell him is negative. And he often concludes with ‘so how can you care about this/why do you give a shit if it’s pointless’ and I’m finding it harder and harder to answer that question.

          Ignorance truly is bliss

    • dustycups@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 months ago

      Adam Savage had a bit where he pointed out there is practically zero times when to you should start a sentence with “why don’t you just”. My first instinct is to patiently listen & respond but I’m slowly turning into “why don’t you just stop, think & rephrase that”

    • howrar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’ve always interpreted “why don’t we just X?” as a shorter way of expressing “I think I would like X. Is this a good idea? If not, why? If yes, what are the barriers to making it happen?”

  • treadful@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    My hot take: You shouldn’t downvote comments you disagree with in a thread asking for hot takes.

    • multifariace@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I have always upvoted comments I disagree with if they are using good arguments. I save downvotes for hate and bad faith.

    • Domi@lemmy.secnd.me
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I really like that you can view who upvoted/downvoted a post on Lemmy. Makes for some interesting analysis on some posts.

    • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s a shame that this needs to be a “hot take”, I was hoping we’d be leaving that shit behind on Reddit.

    • howrar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I think this should apply in general, not just in this thread. Down votes are reserved for comments that do not positively contribute to the conversation.

  • Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    4 months ago

    No one authentically hates the word moist. There’s no evidence then anyone disliked the word before Friends made an episode about it. Everyone since that has either been parroting that episode or someone who, in turn, parroted the episode.

    Either these people saw it and decided it was an interesting facet to add to their personality, or it was the first time they’ve ever consciously thought about how a word feels and sounds and that shattered their ignorance and spoiled a perfectly good word.

      • Rev3rze@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        I don’t remember a friends episode about this either. I do remember it being on how I met your mother though so possibly the person you’re replying to was thinking of that.

      • Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Personally I dislike squelch, mulch, ask, just a ton of words, but I dislike them because they way they fell in my mouth. Either they’re hard to pronounce or they don’t feel nice in my mouth.

        • intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Turns out liquids of unusual viscosity is an excellent heuristic for things you shouldn’t put in your mouth.

  • mub@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Places of religious worship and formal teaching (e.g. churches, and Sunday schools) should be treated like bars and porn. You need to be an adult to access bars and porn because children do not fully understand what is happening or the consequences of being there. Churches (etc) are the same and there should be a legal age limit.

    It should also be socially unacceptable to talk about religious opinions in front of kids, just like most people don’t swear or talk dirty, etc.

    I agree with schools teaching kids “about” religions, just like sex and drugs. Teaching facts is good, preaching (aka indoctrination) is not.

  • cygnus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    The vast majority of people whining about the current political landscape have done absolutely nothing IRL to remedy this (tangibly supporting good candidates, running for office themselves, etc.)

  • NataliePortland@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Lemmy is left leaning but downvotes anything that suggests poll numbers are slipping for Biden, or if people are unsatisfied with his performance. It’s news! Are y’all just downvoting it because you don’t like it?

    • darvit@lemmy.darvit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      Don’t you know, the downvote button is the dislike button, on pretty much every platform. Also, upvote is agree button. They have nothing to do with whether a comment is relevant to the topic or not.

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Lemmy.world and Lemmy.ca tend to be right-leaning even if they have some Leftist comms. The fediverse still appeals to leftists, but liberals have their own enclaves.

    • Amerikan Pharaoh@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      “Pulling for Biden” is most certainly not ‘leaning left’, lmfao. Precisely two and a half instances actually lean left; the rest are typically as bad as if not worse than Reddit libbery on geopolitical takes.

  • toomanypancakes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    There’s no ethical way to kill someone that’s done nothing to you and doesn’t want to die, and that’s not just for humans.

    • folkrav@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      I guess we could say “humane”, or “as quick and painless as possible”?

      • Gloomy@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Bullshit. You wouldn’t call it ethical to kill a 5 year old you see in the street just because it is done quick and painless.

        Murder doesn’t become ethical just because it’s not also torture.

  • toastal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    If your free software communications can only be done thru US-based, proprietary options, then you are not free software. To think open source is ideal for your project, but not the tools surrounding it misses the point of trying uplift support & usage of these free sorts of projects (& this isn’t even starting with the privacy & lock-in concerns). Instead of coding around flaws in Microsoft GitHub or building Discord/Slack/Telegram bots, actually build & upstream integrations into the free options as you would like to see folks do unto your own project. Not saying you can’t have these services as an alternative, but as the only option (or the primary option to IIABH) should be shamed & definitely not considered the norm.

    Also Matrix is pretty shit, where all the clients/servers run too heavy, & eventual-consistency means self-hosting storage often ballots into ‘too expensive’ which has led to de facto centralization the project cannot fix by design. Meaning Matrix is a better, but still bad chat option.

    • Urist@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      What fundemental aspect of Matrix is both causing too heavy performance degradation while also being unfixable or impossible to reimplement?

      • toastal@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        You could switch some of the problems with perf in switching away from the Python implementation server as well as Element clients but these support the most up-to-date features & the majority of users are now relying on these features that often don’t degrade graacefully.

        The bigger issue is eventual consistency. Eventual consistency will not scale for small self-hosting. Every message & every attachment for every user in every chatroom they have joined must be duplicated to your server. This is why joining rooms sometmies takes 10 minutes. Even if you make this async from the client side instead of the current long wait, your server & storage are still taking the hit. A lot of small collectives had to drop their servers for performance & cost (read about yet another one today on the Techlore thread at c/privacy where now only Discord is used for realtime coms). This model is required to copycat the ability to search the entire history like the big, proprietary chat apps such as Slack/Telegram/Discord, but they are centralized so it is easier to manage—but its overuse for all announcement & trying to replace forums turns it into a black hole for information. Your small community probably does not need persistent chat like this—persistent info is lighter & easier to crawl as feeds & forums. With medium-sized servers shutting down, only the biggest & smallest hosts are still kicking with most metadata is largely centralized around Matrix.org who also hosts some of the other larger instances.

        If you agree that chat can be chatter as well as ephemeral there is lightweight centralized chat in IRCv3 with TLS has most of the features you need with a longer legacy & massive choice for clients & XMPP for lightweight decentralized chat with a long legacy, client options too, & can be self-hosted in a bedroom on a toaster in comparison which increases the chances of self-hosters & decentralization. These were built in a time when we didn’t have such wasteful taste in tech since they needed to be efficient & only sip power/data in comparison both for clients & servers & storage. The bigger question IMO is what are fundamentally wrong with these two mature options that we need a new option built on unextensible JSON & Israeli Intelligence money?

        • Urist@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Well, in their FAQ the Matrix team states that they love both IRC and XMPP and that for those whom these options perform better they wish the best of luck continuing to use them. Matrix does have some qualities they do not and they do not mean to compete with them, rather to put up bridges so as to federate between these decentralized protocols.

          Personally, I want to move away from communicating through Discord with many of my friends. I do not believe neither IRC nor XMPP would entice them, but Matrix could as soon as they finish implementing their new video call capabilities. The same goes for community projects that use Discord as a replacement for forums.

          • toastal@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Entice how? Spinning up XMPP on any hardware is simple to federate with you—& I wouldn’t wish they all self-host Matrix instances. XMPP’s jingle protocol works for voice/video & I use it self-hosted with my partner. What are the others missing considering the weight of the applications is literally felt. If you want a web client with stickers & reactions (& calling), what is Movim missing? Replacing forums is a part of the problem, not something to replicate… Movim & Libervia cover community posts that are web searchable.

            • Urist@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              I have no experience with the last two options you mentioned, but I was of the understanding that XMPP does not have video group call functionality. Also, it has been a long time since I used XMPP at all, but syncing history between sessions was not possible to me then. These are features that would be deal breakers to miss.

              • toastal@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                4 months ago

                History / sync is known as message archive management (MAM) & every normal modern client & server supports it. OMEMO uses same double-ratchet encryption & multiple clients as Matrix (with the same old client key dropping issues sadly). By default it does not support groups you are correct, however, FOSS Jitsi (& Zoom for that matter) is powered by XMPP under the hood & can be stood up by yourself.

                Personally three of my circles have opted for separate Mumble servers for voice coms (I run one of them from my living room) as video is only ever rarely needed & the system resources is minimal. Having web cams on is seen as a chore & distraction sometimes. The only time video is helpful in my experience is screen share which is different—but screensharing is the worst tool for trying to do code pairing / debugging a terminal using upterm provides a crisper view experience, lower data/system requirements, & observers can optionally drive the remote session.

                • Urist@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Did not know about MAM, but that sounds great. I also hosted a Mumble server for my friends for over 5 years, but it was basically never used because there existed a one-stop solution (Discord) that allowed for more stuffTM. TIL Jitsi was powered by XMPP, thanks. I personally have no problem with fragmenting functionality between different specialized applications, but it will always be a tough sell for those I know because they believe they can have it all in their cool app.

                  At the end of the day, communication services usefulness are upwards limited by the people you can reach through them. The need for everything to be easy and centralized for the user (ironic with respect to server federation, I know) is what has made me so hopeful for the Matrix protocol, since it is designed for allowing this while still being decentralized at its core.

      • toastal@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        IRCv3 for accessibility if I need it to be centralized & TLS is the only useful encryption (such as a public chat room); otherwise XMPP + OMEMO for decentralized (but also is great for public chat rooms). No need to reinvent battle-tested, mature standards.

        • ssm@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          Never thought I’d find another IRC and XMPP fan on lemmy. Let’s replace SSM/MMS/RCS with XMPP while we’re at it.

            • ssm@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 months ago

              Yeah I’ve used jmp.chat before, but I couldn’t get any of the clients to work well with my pinephone’s microphone. Shame, since it’s the closest you’re going to get to VoIP on the thing.

            • Kairos@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              Yeah.

              I used it recently. Its actually really nice! Its fast. It also suffers from clients being weird. Although it is very stable. And extremely resource light. Apparently a single server can support 100,000 users or something. And it has distributed servers too (which is possible because it’s stateless. Wish Matrix had it though)

              Matrix is in my (and a lot of other people’s opinion) way better for the future. The encryption is better, and there’s a lot more stuff supported by it. Importantly moderation.

              • amanneedsamaid@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                Dino on Linux and Conversations for Android are both amazing clients imo, but the rest I’ve tried are SEVERELY lacking. Especially on iOS.

                I personally think the future from a technological perspective is SimpleX Chat. Fixes so many issues that plague other private IMs, however I’m waiting to switch until I see that their venture capital strategy is actually sustainable and won’t enshittify it.

                • Kairos@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  That’s what I use actually. Very nice, but just… Matrix makes more sense for the masses.

                  What does simplex do? Is it a P2P thing?

  • csolisr@hub.azkware.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 months ago

    @TehBamski Most entertainment is produced in abusive environments, promotes positively evil people to become famous, and twists the legal system through in such a way that it enables surveillance and erodes ownership rights. But barely anyone is willing to boycott it.