• flicker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    I dunno. I’m a woman and I didn’t notice the skin-tight thing until it was pointed out, but looking back at it, wouldn’t any clothes do that at 90 mph?

    ACAB but it doesn’t look horny to me. She’s just woman-shaped to me.

    • DaGeek247@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      wouldn’t any clothes do that at 90 mph?

      ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Maybe, but it still managed to not look right despite that. It feels more like a failure to communicate speed with the art rather than intending horny anyways. That’s part of the problem though. The image looks horny first, and speedy second, or really even third.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I genuinely cannot believe that people still care about this in the year 2024.

      Like, does anyone care if people draw animal people looking cute or sexy or just with human proportions or anything in between? Does it really bother anyone or is it just fun to try to bandwagon something that freaked some housewives out in the 90’s because some inside edition episode? It’s just drawings of animal characters like have been done for literal millenia. Imagine if some of the more “notorious” disney films came out today, people would lose their minds.

      • El Barto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Oh yeah, because when I see Egyptian hieroglyphs, I think sexy beasts.

        The point is not the anthropomorphism. The point is related tothe deliberate sexual undertone. And I’m not even a prude. I don’t care much about what people prefer. It’s just that the Internet broke us.

        It’s like the word “cuck” (ugh.) A scholar may use it in the utmost right context, and yet, all that word does is infuriate me because of the overuse the The_Donald crowd gave to it.

      • DaGeek247@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Woah, hey, easy there. You’re starting to take this personally. Dial it back a little.

        I genuinely cannot believe that people still care about this in the year 2024.

        Nobody cares that it’s a horny image. This is the internet in 2024. The artist just managed to hit that sweet spot of genuine effort + not quite skilled enough = unintentionally hilarious. It’s bad movie night, but for comics.

        We’re all laughing at the stripper cop who the artist genuinely expected us to take seriously, not complaining that there’s clutches pearls big titty cheetah cops!

        Imagine if some of the more “notorious” disney films came out today, people would lose their minds.

        You mean like zootopia?

    • El Barto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      it doesn’t look horny to me. She’s just woman-shaped to me.

      An animal. Shaped as a fit, sexy woman. Shared on Lemmy. Yeah, not horny. Sure.