• Madison420@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    32
    ·
    4 months ago

    It’s literally rocks. You’re valuing human life less than rocks, I think that says more about you than them.

    • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      How is this dangerous to human life in any way? They did this to the plane while it was in the ground. Presumably someone is going to clean it before attempting takeoff, and I doubt a new paint job is going to severely impact the safety of the airplane regardless. I mean I guess if they somehow clogged all the static ports it would be a problem, but that’s not particularly likely and only really a deadly situation if you take off at night or with less than competent pilots. Those are supposed to be checked before every flight regardless.

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        You got my point backwards boss. The climate protestors care, the people bugging about rocks don’t care about human life, they care about rocks that have historically been vandalized to make a point literally hundreds of times.

        • Crikeste@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          They’re rocks as well. They’ll be fine. A little paint doesn’t destroy them like temperatures do to the planet.

        • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          You might want to go and tell that to the people down voting your comment. Clearly people are not understanding what you put, an edit might be in order.

          • Madison420@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            I’m not particularly bothered by down votes, to me it sorta weeds out bad faith actors anyway.

              • Madison420@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                It makes perfect sense.

                “It’s literally rocks…” Whats just rocks? Stonehenge!

                “You’re valuing human life less than rocks, I think that says more about you than them.”

                What are the protestors protesting for? Climate change.

                Ie. If vandalizing Stonehenge is a bigger issue to you than climate change then you’re valuing human life less than rocks.

                It could not be any more clear and I think that’s pretty evident based on the lack of offering a better wording.

                • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  It sounded like you are comparing the stonehenge protest to the one with the planes, not with climate change. Safety is critical in aviation, so it might sound dangerous to people that the planes were painted. I would instead say something like “they are valuing literal rocks over the lives of people claimed by climate disasters”. Then it’s clear you are talking about climate change in the second instance, and not the people flying the plane.

    • AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Problem with this argument that you can justify all kinds of crap with this. Vandalising artwork? Its just paint, you’re valuing human life less than paint? Burning a few buildings? It’s just propety bro you’re valuing some planks over human life?

      It kinda smells like the eu chat analysis law whatever where they’re pulling the classic “you’re valuing privacy over children?”. Though I guess they would frame it more like “you’re putting paedophiles over children?!”.

      Nah, I don’t like this direction.

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        No you can’t. It’s literally rocks, all uncarved aside from historical graffiti/vandalism. Ruining a painting that is not open to the elements and easily repaired by simply letting it rain is not the same as rocks that are.

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Just remember, you took time out of your day to seek someone out and act twatty. Good job, keep it up.

        • Soulg@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          No, I read a dumb comment and spent a few seconds saying that it was dumb. Nice try though.

          • Madison420@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            That’s still taking time out of your day and finding something to be a douchebag about, contribute to the conversation or keep your mean bully bullshit to yourself.