• eltrain123@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    It’s more complicated, but you can still use crowd-sourcing to recognize the ads. Then use an algo to analyze the ad, frame by frame, and reject that when it shows up.

    It’ll take a bit of time, but their strategy isn’t going to last. It’s ‘arms-race’ style escalation on a digital front. Eventually, the crowd sourcing will be replaced by AI/ML tools. Ad companies, like google, will always try to fight back, but open-source will always respond.

    You can’t beat nerds that are skilled and passionate about not getting fucked.

      • HonorableScythe@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        Already happening, sort of. Google allows companies to upload sets of headlines, images, and descriptions, then Google’s system mashes them together and tests them to find the best combos. It’s not full AI, but considering some companies doing this are probably AI-generating the input, it’s getting close. I wouldn’t imagine it’ll be too long until Google does it for you.

    • Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      When programmers with ADHD/Autism get interrupted from a fixation (like a video), suppressing that interruption, even if unproductive or unimportant, becomes their new fixation.

      I’ve been guilty of this many times, for better or worse.

      • SailorMoss@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I feel personally attacked by this comment.

        I spent like 8 hours yesterday figuring out how to install viewtube on my NAS because I got the YouTube Adblock warning on my iPad.

    • slacktoid@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      AI ad block. The AI watches (or just parses the to the audio transcription) the video before you and can mark when and where to skip from and to. With these 40TOPs machines that could be possible.

  • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    5 months ago

    Go to your favorite YT creator’s channels and download important content! Educational content, lectures, nostalgic content. Anything and everything you have the storage for.

    One day, it will be locked away behind paywalls, poisoned with ads, or just deleted entirely.

    Part of preparing for war is stockpiling supplies. Buy bulk storage. An extra 2-4 TB hard drive can be bought for 100-200 dollars. It doesn’t have to be fancy, get a friend or two to go in with you on it.

    Download and save everything you value. Rip your physical media and save it, pirate the shows and movies you love. One day it will be locked away or stolen from you because the terms of service changed.

    Please don’t delay, I wish I had started years ago myself.

    • booty [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Just keep in mind that hard drives do not last forever. They’ll last a few years of regular use, maybe up to a decade if you’re lucky. Storing media on a hard drive is not like having a box of books in your basement, your kids aren’t going to be able to use them in 40 years.

    • Player2@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 months ago

      Bit outdated info on hard drive pricing, I recently bought 12TB drives for $85 each (albeit used)

      • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        You’re right though, actually even cheaper than I thought.

        5TB portable HDDs new on Newegg for $100 - $150

        All the more reason to start hoarding data!

  • booty [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    5 months ago

    It was only a matter of time before Google put their foot down and insisted that you can’t have a good experience on YouTube. Its time is coming.

  • _sideffect@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    5 months ago

    If it’s part of the video now, doesn’t that mean we can just fast forward through it?

    Because if it’s something explicit in the stream, then ad blockers will just look for that and we’re back to where we are currently.

  • amotio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I have said this in another post here, as a joke, that YT can just inject the ads in the main video stream, and it would be just like cable tv where you can’t skip the ad.

    I swear it was a joke.

    edit: spelling

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      Then I’ll just start downloading videos and playing them back skipping ads.

      All of the ai bullshit out there, there might actually be a good use for ai, is cutting out ads out of video.

      Fuck YouTube and fuck Google.

      • NorthWestWind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Reminds me of my home’s first TV recorder. It actually came with a trimming function and we could cut the ads out.

  • FuckyWucky [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Adblockers can still mute and stop the user from seeing the ads with black screen (or fast forward). Advertisers will still be mad.

    Yes ik they disable the video controls but the video is still served just like before, just that they inject ads into it.

    • 4am@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      This is why Chrome browsers wanted Manifest v3 or whatever- they took away the APIs for extensions to do stuff like that.

        • 4am@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Correct. 65% of all human internet traffic is unmodified Chrome.

          When Firefox was slow, Internet Explorer was clunky and didn’t render anything correctly, and scrappy upstart with a “Don’t be evil” slogan and great search engine Google came out with a new fast, memory efficient web browser, all us nerds ran out and told everyone “look! The internet doesn’t suck anymore! Use Chrome!” We were all amazed that we could have like 5 tabs open on our PCs with a whole gigabyte of RAM.

          The normies echoed this through time, never unchanging - “my kid says ‘Chrome’ is the good one”. Even when sites started breaking when viewed in other browsers…didn’t we just finish fighting this “standards” war? Isn’t this what we destroyed Internet Explorer for?

  • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I guess no more ad-free experience in privacy-respecting clients. Well that sucks but let’s hope it at least won’t kill them completely

  • dodeca@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’ve got a couple questions about this.

    If the timestamp is off, how does the share link with timestamp work?

    If I quit watching the video when an ad starts and then start watching it again, does it continue with the ad? I watch yt on my Samsung tv and it’s an ad minefield, but it’s kinda fun and easy to report the ads or quit the vid and start it again to avoid the ads. Id rather spend 30 seconds bouncing around menus than watching ads for stuff I don’t use.

    If it’s injected video, can I just skip ahead like I do for sponsored content?

  • SeekPie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Oh no, please no.

    Will uBlock still work or will that also break when/if this gets added?

    • themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      5 months ago

      Legally, YouTube has to tell you you’re watching an ad. This means that at least visually somewhere (it could be baked into the video stream, for example), there should be a distinctive pattern that extensions should be able to grab and make the video fast-forward.

      • sandalbucket@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        If youtube manages to stop fast forwarding, maybe at the very least we could auto-mute, and maybe overlay photos of puppies or something

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Bad idea. People would get a negative Pavlovian reaction to puppies after a while.

          Imagine walking down the street, seeing a puppy and immediately getting annoyed! That’s no way to live, man! 😄

    • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      As I understood the ad will be a part of the actual video file you receive but, unlike fixed sponsor integrations, the time it’s shown at will change every time. That is going to be impossible to get rid of without AI unless there are some exploits

  • toxic_cloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    Are the ads injected in real-time or at the start of the video?

    I assume it uses extra processing power to add them randomly for each user individually so if it was the latter would rapidly refreshing the page over and over again force them to completely rerun the process over again and slow their servers down? I guess I’m not entirely sure how this would work.

    • stalfoss@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      One of the main methods of video delivery is actually by sending a series of 2 second video clips over http. So it would not really take much processing power to insert ads in the middle, it’s not like they are having to encode video or anything.

      • Creosm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        5 months ago

        My thoughts exactly, if ads are injected directly into the video stream itself now we’ll be downloading videos with ads in them…