• verstra@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      5 months ago

      programming.dev does not get it. Can you explain?

      It is kinda obvious that maxist ideas are aligned with the open source ideas. Are they very much against commies?

      • manicdave@feddit.ukOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        50
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        5 months ago

        There’s some weird witch hunt going on against Dessalines on there. I don’t agree with him on everything, but them trying to hound him out for being a communist, whilst using software he made because he’s a communist is kinda funny.

        • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          44
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Honestly I am dismayed we have this dumb ass reddit culture take hold. Not everything you disagree with must be bannned from the sub defederated immediately, your instance doesnt owe you a feed that’s exactly how you like it. Defederation should be the last resort, since it entirely breaks communication and interaction between the instance’s users.

          Instead, use the client side blocking features to clean up your feed. Personally I have blocked over 80 communities and users because they are centered around topics or beliefs I dont want on my feed, I blocked two instances as well, but I can still read their user’s comments and interact with their users outside the instances.

          Defederating is just splintering the fediverse. Unless at all avoidable it shouldn’t be done, in fact I chose my instance specifically because it defederates nobody but meta and illegal content such as gore and csam.

        • r00ty@kbin.life
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          5 months ago

          I always saw open source as more socialist than specifically communist. Similar to volunteering in your community. Except the community is the whole world, and you don’t need to leave your house. Bonus!

          • manicdave@feddit.ukOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            To be honest I’d say it’s more similar to anarchism than socialism. Anarchism is voluntarist whilst socialism demands state power first. Both are ideally paths to communism* though so I’m going to say “communism” 'cause it annoys the most people.

            communism as in post capitalist, post state utopia, not Stalinism*

        • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          5 months ago

          Him being communist isn’t the problem, throwing his weight around unnecessarily is what is upsetting people. And he just keeps doing it. Like he just gets in a mood and decides to ban a bunch of people for fake violations they didn’t actually do. It’s all logged and people with high enough status can see the logs. He goes on tirades.

      • pjwestin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Not exactly. This started yesterday, when a user accused mods on .ml of, “tankie censorship,” (meaning censorship by tankies, not of tankies). He also came with some pretty good receipts that appear to show .ml mods removing criticism of China that, whether you agree with it or not, didn’t seem to violate any rules, and was well within the bounds of what most people would consider civil discourse. He also claims to have received bans from all of the .ml communities he’d ever participated in for pointing this bias out. It’s possible he’s presenting all of this with his own slant, but what he showed seems legit, and I’m not sure he could have provided more evidence without encouraging brigading.

        This is now starting to snowball, with users starting to call for defederating from .ml. One .world user also posted on .cafe about Dessalines previous tankie comments, while another user has posted about finding replacements for the largest .ml communities.

        So, saying what’s happing on .world is anti-communist isn’t accurate, as most the criticism has been anti-tankie. However, .world has a much higher level of liberals than most of Lemmy (they created a little echo chamber for themselves on Political Memes), and most of them are incapable or unwilling to understand the difference between a tankies and communists (or tankies and leftists…or tankies and criticism of Biden…). So, it will probably only be a matter of time before this group tries to blur the line between valid criticism of baised moderation from authoritarian apologists to general criticism of leftists.

        So, tl;dr: .world isn’t broadly anti-communist, but a large portion of the community is upset about what appears to be biased moderation from tankie .ml mods, and there is a small contingent of .world liberals who I’m sure will take this opportunity to bash anyone to their left.

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          The problem with this is that “Tankie” is a sliding target, including all Marxists. If you claim to only have a problem with Tankies, not all Marxists, but do your best to attack the majority of Marxists, does that mean the majority of Marxists are Tankies, or that .world has become an anticommunist instance?

          I’d say this will only end up creating a multipolar Lemmy. Dessalines has already stated that .ml will not be the first to defed, as they believe in an interconnected Lemmy. However, the target boogyman for .worlders has shifted from Grad, to Hexbear, to now .ml. After .world finally defeds from .ml, will they shift towards db0? Lemm.ee, perhaps? Who knows.

          This isn’t the first time this has happened, haha.

          • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Tankie used to have a specific and clear meaning

            But then people not in the know learned the word without caring what it meant

            So now it just means “guy that I think is an asshole (leftist beliefs optional but expected)”

          • DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Wasn’t it .world that defed from db0 already (but later added it back) because of the piracy support? Or maybe that was .ee? When that happened I moved from that instance to here.

          • orsetto@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            5 months ago

            Honestly i wouldn’t mind. Users on .world that don’t want a butt load of defederations will probably (and hopefully) move to another instance, whilst the rest of lemmy will be free from all the liberals uncapable of discriminating between communists and tankies

            • barsquid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              And .world would be free of all the communists incapable of discriminating between communists and tankies. Everyone wins.

          • pjwestin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            5 months ago

            I really only started to see the meaning of tankie start sliding once I got to Lemmy, and it goes in two directions; tankies who swear they aren’t tankies, they just have a lot of feelings about why the Uyghurs aren’t being mistreated, and liberals who literally think tankie is a synonym for leftist. (Seriously, if Lemmy has one unforgivable sin, it’s introducing the, “but her emails,” crowd to the word tankie.) Personally, I don’t care if I get tankies in my feed, but I’m not OK with instances that censor opinions they don’t like (I mean, assuming they’re not bigoted). Those mod logs are pretty damning, I’d like to hear from the .ml mods why they felt those weren’t legitimate discourse.

            Honestly, my real takeaway from this whole mess is that it’s really dispelled the myth of federation as a silver bullet for all of social media’s ills. Federation was sold to me as a solution to overly-large internet communities, since federation would stop single communities from becoming too powerful, and communities could simply be defederated if they didn’t get along. Meanwhile, .world is whining that .ml’s communities are too large and important to lose, while .ml is bitching that .world defederating would be egregious and unreasonable. The whole thing feels more like a flame war between some large subreddits than the glorious online utopia that I was told federation would bring us. Actually, it feels a lot like the schism that started when r/antiwork fell apart.

            • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              I really only started to see the meaning of tankie start sliding once I got to Lemmy, and it goes in two directions; tankies who swear they aren’t tankies, they just have a lot of feelings about why the Uyghurs aren’t being mistreated, and liberals who literally think tankie is a synonym for leftist.

              This was already happening in Reddit roughly 2 years ago.

            • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              5 months ago

              I don’t think .ml is whining about .world defeding, more like thinking it would be goofy, but expecting it.

        • MeowZedong@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          This isn’t an attack on your comment, which gave quality information, but I think it’s relevant to the conversations linked in your comment.

          Their definition of authoritarian is a contradiction to their actions and used subjectively. “I hate authoritarianism, so we should defederate to keep out the authoritarians.” This statement is supportive of a fundamentally authoritarian action.

          This is also why people who use the term “tankies” seriously are themselves deeply unserious. Their understanding of the topic is superficial at best and colored only by Western biases rooted in anti-communist propaganda. The concept of authoritarianism was itself a product of propaganda.

          Saying “no” is authoritarian. Holding elections is authoritarian. Authority itself doesn’t matter, what matters is who is in power and how they use their power to influence the world.

          Some people recognize and accept this reality and then openly support the power that best aligns with their own benefit.

          Anger at tankies is usually just a lack of class consciousness and ignorance based on a term that changes based on who you support and who you do not.

        • _donnadie_
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          there is a small contingent of .world liberals who I’m sure will take this opportunity to bash anyone to their left.

          They are very active though, and they don’t lose their chance to mention and antagonize .ml, which I think is kind of shitty. It happens even in threads where people are commenting about stuff unrelated to politics. lemmy.world is constantly looking for targets to defederate from.

          edit: I’d like to mention that I’m not disagreeing with you, I’m just giving my perspective on it.

          • pjwestin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Oh, yeah, they’re a very loud, obnoxious little group, and removing users that are only interested in picking fights is perfectly valid. But the screenshots from the original post really only seemed to be talking about China’s censorship of Tiananmen Square, and while it’s impossible to say without of context, their tone really didn’t seem to be combative. They just seemed to be expressing opinions about China that didn’t align with the .ml mods’ beliefs, and that’s troubling.

            What’s more, Dessalines gave a response that’s kinda telling about all this. A user called .ml out on censorship (in a very respectful tone), and Dessalines basically replied saying asking questions is OK when it’s done in good faith, but a lot of people only ask them to start fights. When the user replied that he was actually talking about people being censored for expressing opinions in good faith that run counter to .ml mods beliefs, Dessalines chose not to reply.

            I really seems like .ml wants to remove opinions that run contrary to the mods beliefs about communism. If that is the case, fair enough, but then maybe it does make sense for instances that don’t moderate that way to defederate. I don’t want to worry about policing myself on a bunch of the communities in my feed because I might get banned for my opinion on a news story.

            Maybe these fears are unfounded, and this whole thing is being blown out of proportion, but none of the .ml mods have addressed the original post yet. Dessalines has left several comments on the Ask Lemmy post Are You a Tankie, but he’s chosen not to reply to the censorship claim. Given the silence, I have to assume the worst.

        • Aria@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          He also came with some pretty good receipts that appear to show .ml mods removing criticism of China that, whether you agree with it or not, didn’t seem to violate any rules, and was well within the bounds of what most people would consider civil discourse.

          but what he showed seems legit, and I’m not sure he could have provided more evidence without encouraging brigading.

          Based on just your link, it just kinda looks like he was posting unsourced gore. That doesn’t feel like civil discourse to me.

          I don’t really see any criticism being removed. If Katana314’s message was congruent with reality it would count, but otherwise just making accusations isn’t criticism.

        • DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          I love being able to block individual people. I’ve seen much less “pro-Biden a vote not for Biden is a vote for Trump” political compass meme shit lately because of that.

          • barsquid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            5 months ago

            You better block me as well. I don’t know why we should help support Bibi’s favorite candidate by doing exactly what Repubs want and voting for someone who barely broke 1% of the popular vote. I guess people really want more far-right theocratic judges who are blatantly unqualified and corrupt?

            • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              I’ll bite. The democrats aren’t listening to us, we have two options: not support them in the election or (it was surprising to see this one end up in the news recently) an appeal to heaven.

              If you think trump is too much of a threat, that the president we already had will destroy democracy and there won’t be a 2028 election, that the most important thing is to keep out a candidate who didn’t accept it the last time he was declared the loser of an election and has had four years to prepare for this one as evidenced by project 2024, stop trying to get people to vote for the democrats and start stockpiling ammunition and training to oppose trump supporters in the streets instead.

              • barsquid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                SCOTUS is right now still somehow deliberating on whether a president is allowed to Night of the Long Knives or not. SCOTUS is already taking away rights from my friends and neighbors. You may be privileged enough to pretend it won’t affect you, I guess.

                You think you aren’t being heard now, it isn’t going to improve under a fascist regime that ends voting with their Project 2025 shit. Have you not been paying attention to how Repubs have dealt with protesters? Yeah, becoming an armed insurgent would be the only option for change remaining once it gets to that point.

                That’s cool, though, you do you.

                • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Wait, the unelected branches of government are restricting rights of minorities and giving power to the executive branch now but we won’t have fascism to fight against until this one guy wins an election?

                  What happened last time he wasn’t declared the winner of an election? What makes you think that wouldn’t be a concern this time around? How do you square that with the degree of preparation that went into project 2025?

                  Let me make my thesis crystal clear: if you believe that trump will usher in American fascism and you recognize that he won’t accept the results of the election, you don’t need to get people to vote for Biden to make sure the results of the election aren’t in favor of trump, you need to prepare to physically confront trump supporters in the streets with guns and training to prevent a for real this time coup.

                  I’m not saying that to get you to go out and buy an ar-15 and a plate carrier (although you should, theyre not getting any cheaper), but to get you to recognize the absurdity of holding all those beliefs together.

                  • barsquid@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    I do think that’s a concern this time around. I think the best chance at stopping it is not giving him the legal right to take office, and not giving him a blank check to Long Knife whomever he wants.

                    Yeah, I guess I see your point also. Assume the country will be attacked either way. Get ready to defend myself if not fight for it. I don’t disagree.

                    I still remain unconvinced that it is a good move to throw a vote away instead of casting it against Donald.

            • DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              Your Savior, Genocide Joe, had the ability to put more people in the Supreme Court but he didn’t. Stop with the bullshit.

              You support genocide.

              Wish granted.

              • barsquid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                Thought you were blocking us? Keep helping Bibi’s preferred candidate, great work. When the killing accelerates even faster you can pat yourself on the back.

            • DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              You support a candidate that is supporting a genocidal regime. You support genocide.

              Wish granted!

            • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              5 months ago

              Do you think trump is going to accept being declared the loser this time?

              Last time some people tried to reverse the election results.

              This time they’ve got a plan to harness the administrative states power once they get the presidency. Do you think there hasn’t been an equal amount of planning what to do to stop the steal a second time?

      • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        5 months ago

        .world is basically Reddit 2, but filled with the most radical liberals that specifically want to not be exposed to leftist instances, even db0 has a tenuous relation with them.

        .world is constantly on anticommunist witch hunts, and now that Lemmygrad and Hexbear are not visible to them thanks to defederation, .ml is the last large Marxist-aligned instance they can see, so it’s the new boogeyman.

        One of them tried to tell me Lemmy is Capitalist because posting is value, lmao

          • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Which part? Posting being value? They tried to use Marx’ Labor Theory of Value to say that because admins aren’t decided democratically, and posting is labor and therefore creates Value, Lemmy is Capitalist.

            This is, in fact, ridiculous, because Lemmy has a Use-Value but no Exchange-Value. Posting isn’t labor, and anyone can fork it.

      • A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        Are they very much against commies?

        We’re not, OP is just butthurt about Their Guy™ getting publicly dunked on for tankie branded censorship

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Cool, then unblock Hexbear and Lemmygrad.

          You can’t have it both ways, either you’re against Communism or you aren’t, and blocking every overtly Communist instance makes it obvious.

          There’s nothing wrong with running things how you want to, but please keep a consistent line or this drama will just move on to a new target, like dbzer0 after .world finally commits to defederating.

            • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              What separates a Marxist from a tankie? Are Anarchists tankies?

              There are no .world communities for Communism, Socialism, or Marxism, so all of the Marxists who wish to contribute must do it on instances like Lemmy.ml, Lemmygrad.ml, Hexbear.net, or dbzer0. Lemmy.world deliberately blocking their users from contributing or even seeing Hexbear or Lemmygrad, and possibly soon even Lemmy.ml, is censorship of Marxists from its own users.

              Or is there a secret commie gathering in .world I don’t know about?

                • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  What Marxists get the pass, and which don’t?

                  There are no .world communities for Communism, Socialism, or Marxism, so all of the Marxists who wish to contribute must do it on instances like Lemmy.ml, Lemmygrad.ml, Hexbear.net, or dbzer0. Lemmy.world deliberately blocking their users from contributing or even seeing Hexbear or Lemmygrad, and possibly soon even Lemmy.ml, is censorship of Marxists from its own users.

                  Return2ozma got banned on Lemmy.world for criticizing Biden.

                  Or is there a secret commie gathering in .world I don’t know about?

                  • A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    What Marxists get the pass, and which don’t?

                    Non-authoritarians and authoritarians respectively. It’s not that complicated.

                    There are no .world communities for Communism

                    Did you seriously not even look? Or do you not understand how the fediverse works

                    Return2ozma got banned on Lemmy.world for criticizing Biden.

                    Doubt.

            • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Is that why Hexbear and Lemmygrad were blocked? Hexbear being one of the largest and most active overtly trans-positive instances, and Lemmygrad being the largest explicitly Marxist Instance?

              You’re just calling them pedophiles now rather than even entertain the idea that .world just doesn’t like Communists.

              You’re treating Communism like liberals treat gay people, fine and supportive until they actually have to see gay people and complain about representation in TV and movies.

              • zbyte64@awful.systems
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                5 months ago

                Is that why Hexbear and Lemmygrad were blocked? Hexbear being one of the largest and most active overtly trans-positive instances, and Lemmygrad being the largest explicitly Marxist Instance?

                Blocked for being antisocial? Yes. If it was about being trans then Blahaj would have been blocked a long time ago.

                If anything, I’m complaining about bad communist tropes dominating the media representation, and by that I mean leninists.

                • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  It isn’t a trope if the vast majority of Marxists also agree with Lenin worldwide, lmao.

                  It’s blatantly anticommunism, not just because people are “antisocial.” You’re like a republican with a token gay friend that complains about the LGBTQ community dominating everything these days, lol. It’s sad, just own up to being anticommunist.

                  • zbyte64@awful.systems
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    5 months ago

                    When I say antisocial behavior I’m not talking about ideology but historical actions like banning people posting literal facts about tiananmen or any other historical event. When responses fail to acknowledge actual history that is brought up, then it is likely working from a reactionary framework.