• narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    The problem is that NVIDIA isn’t resting on their laurels, they improve by a large margin from architecture to architecture and continue to innovate features. AMD can barely keep up imitating some of these features (upscaling, RT, frame generation, heck even NVENC is superior to what Radeon offers) and the results are often worse (RT performance, DLSS vs FSR).

    AMD only barely undercuts NVIDIA’s pricing based on raster performance, so this is essentially the easiest upsell ever. Pay 15 % more but get better versions of features, new features early, broader compatibility also in terms of compute and more efficiency? Sure, most people will pay 15 % more for that.

    AMD needs to be way more aggressive on pricing and try to innovate useful features first on Radeon. That being said, I think NVIDIA would simply price-match as soon as AMD gains any traction.

    At this point I have more faith in Intel to be competitive in a few generations. They seem to be able to almost match RT performance, already putting AMD to shame with their first generation of Arc GPUs. Their upscaling tech is way closer to DLSS, Intel QSV is a pretty solid hardware encoder and let’s hope they do a better job competing at compute.

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      The problem is that Nvidia pulls proprietary nonsense out of their ass, specifically to say “AMD can’t do [blank]!”

      Physics. Sound. Compute. Hair. Raytracing. Upscaling. And on and on and on, aggressively poised to be incompatible. CUDA is fifteen years old and Nvidia still threatens anyone who tries cross-compiling it to SPIR-V or OpenCL.

      This is anti-competitive behavior from a blatant monopoly. They have supermajority market share - they are abusing it. The right answer is to shatter this corporation.

    • Morgoon@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      5 months ago

      AMD is doing really great things with APUs like the Steam Deck. I just got a travel mini PC with a Ryzen 7 7840U. It can play most games at 1080p high quality with 30fps and fits in the palm of my hand.

      It might be a while before you can play VR on an APU but they’re already comparable to GPUs from 5 years ago

      • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I keep looking at SteamDecks but can’t pull the trigger.

        Besides gaming what can you do with it? Like can I browse the darkweb on the go? Does it have regular PC functionality?

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      Fire and motion.

      Nvidia essentially forces AMD to clone whatever bullshit they do next, or else Nvidia will fixate on it and crow about how AMD can’t do [blank]. It’s a pattern of anticompetitive behavior. It only works because Nvidia has such a dominant market share… and it is a method to preserve and deepen that divide. They do not want fair comparisons between their hardware and AMD’s, and they actively prevent software compatibility. This has been going on so long that I used to type this up about nVidia and ATI.