• volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    The opposite of less restrictive zoning is a good idea. The good idea is to have our cities designed by experts in urban planning, with the goal of maximizing quality of life and efficiency of infrastructure. The free market won’t achieve an optimal solution, proper planning will. Add social housing to the mix and you’ve suddenly also solved the housing crisis.

    • vividspecter@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I don’t disagree, but that’s a harder sell politically so it’s not something that governments are going to implement without widespread consensus. Whereas reducing zoning restrictions and parking minimums and the like can be implemented more easily and have some impact even if it doesn’t solve all of the more fundamental problems. If you want more than that, you’re going to need an overwhelming progressive voter base, and I’d say it’s not there yet in most Western democracies.

      • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Cheap social housing is harder to sell politically than allowing companies to do whatever they want with the construction of housing? Nah.

        You’re taking to a commie, the path towards change is rarely reformism. I’ll support reforms in the meanwhile, sure, but not “free market” nonsolutions. Besides, similar problems occur in Europe (where I’m from) with suburban sprawl, and there aren’t such strict zoning laws here,

        • vividspecter@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Cheap social housing is harder to sell politically than allowing companies to do whatever they want with the construction of housing? Nah.

          That part is fine and doable, it’s the central planning that is going to be a very hard sell. Although I’ll add that you probably want to call it “public housing” as “social housing” typically means “public-private” partnerships (but that may be a language/location difference).