• Kissaki@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I wouldn’t do that, too much tunnel vision and biases.

    Absolutely not. Self-reviews are very productive. I can confirm this from my own work and my colleagues, who also find it so.

    You’re of course free to vary the degree and depth of self-review, but tunnel vision and bias is definitely not overbearing and diminishing in those situations for us.

    Someone else will of course see more, what you may not see due to tunnel vision. But that’s besides the point.

    • stuckgum@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Weird, never heard of anyone doing this. Aren’t your team self reviewing the code while writing it?

      • Rogue@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        When you finish the final sentence of an essay or a report do you just submit it straight away? You don’t read it through?

      • Kissaki@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        How do you self-review while writing? What do you mean by that?

        I see it as different phases of development, mindset, and focus. You inherently can’t be in multiple at the same time.

        1. Problem space and solution exploration - an iterative and at times experimental process to find and weigh solutions
        2. Cleanup and self-review - document your findings, decision-making, exclusions, and weighing, verify your solution/changeset makes sense and is complete (to intended scope)
        3. Reviews

        It makes no sense to be thorough during experimental and iterative exploration. That’d be wasted effort.

        After finding a solution, and writing it out, a self-review will make you take a systematic, verifying review mindset.