fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 5 months agoPlacebozmander.xyzimagemessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up11.16Karrow-down13
arrow-up11.16Karrow-down1imagePlacebozmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square47fedilink
minus-squarekatja@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·5 months agoYeah, I haven’t read the study of course. Only read about it. Which makes the claim above even more dubious. But hey, this is the future, who has the time to fact check anymore?
minus-squareKlear@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·5 months agoIf you only read about it that gives it 50% chance at best at being true. Luckily I also read about it, so together that makes it 100% true.
minus-squareTJA!@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·5 months agoYou could ask an AI, maybe they’ll invent a source for you
Yeah, I haven’t read the study of course. Only read about it. Which makes the claim above even more dubious. But hey, this is the future, who has the time to fact check anymore?
If you only read about it that gives it 50% chance at best at being true. Luckily I also read about it, so together that makes it 100% true.
Math checks out.
You could ask an AI, maybe they’ll invent a source for you