Notice there is only 1 full headline (from /r/NoStupidQuestions) visible, it doesn’t even show the full post. There are 3 of those “trending” boxes but only 2 of those even fit their headlines because they are like 3 words long, they cut off anything longer including the description

I originally became addicted to Reddit because of how streamlined it was to skim dozens of headlines and pick from lots of content, seems they have decided content is not something they want to provide anymore :/

  • Z3k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    216
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wow that’s pretty horrible.

    It’s amazing what you miss due to 10 years of browsing with RIF and RES as mandatory installs

    • ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      90
      ·
      1 year ago

      The day that digg launched that new design was the last day I ever logged into that site. Why do people fuck up things that work?

      • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Things that work aren’t profitable (enough). A thing that works is good for expanding customer base. A thing that almost works is good for profit per customer base. The thing is… A thing that works and is sustainable to maintain provides the most long term profits. There’s no legal requirement a company grow in scope, but most investors (both in small and large companies) see that as the only way. Reddit has been operating on an unsustainable business model. Their core feature set is simple. Their userbase was loyal, and willing to pay for Reddit gold to directly keep the website running. The holes in their sustainability were a huge staff to develop features to grow their customer base despite no one wanting or asking for those features, a terrible ad model that left money on the table by not putting ads where they’d have the most effect (why did I always get Ford ads on r/FuckCars, never Taco Bell ads on r/ShittyFoodPorn, no small online stationary shops on r/FountainPens?) and not returning ads in API calls, and finally an API model that went from free to impossible to justify overnight. But no one on the board of directors is interested in a business that consistently makes money over the long term. They want to make as much money as possible all in one go.

        Let me ask you this. Which is better? To run a small coffee roaster that employs 8 people and serves coffee through one physical shop and one online store front to a loyal fan base by serving a high quality product in small batches, or to be massive coffee company, shadowed in scale only by Starbucks and Peets, but going into bankruptcy because you can’t keep up with Starbucks and Peets? I’d take the consistent sustainable business every time, but too many people want to be the big winner with the bankrupt company, and the result is the small investors, the ones who bought into the big coffee company, or Reddit, end up holding the bag while the people who took their money deploy their golden parachutes

        • ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Your example of Reddit’s evolution underscores the challenges that companies face when striving to balance the demands of expansion, customer satisfaction, and financial stability. As companies grow, there’s often a temptation to introduce new features, expand into new markets, or chase the latest trends, even if these decisions may not align with the core needs and desires of their customer base. This can lead to inefficiencies, overspending, and sometimes even a dilution of the very qualities that made the company popular in the first place.

          How profitable did Digg get? It’s definitely a tight rope and the fact that we’re discussing this on Lemmy is a testament to how a lot of the user base feels now.

      • nfh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Designers want to get promoted, or get good bonuses for having impact. Product Managers are similarly incentivized to make changes, to improve some metric that they believe helps their business. If these structures exist, and the people making changes don’t understand what the users want, or their incentives are misaligned… it’s inevitable

        • Spambox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          This makes me think of Microsoft. I get the impression it’s a software and technology company run by suits who are completely detached from end users and every decision is made purely from pie charts, analytics with no nuances included and designers itching to be promoted whispering in their ear.

          So many things that worked perfectly - things people have learned where they are and how to use them for decades get changed for apparently no other reason than just to change them and a constant push to redesign everything into a path towards using one of their new services that already has better existing external services people were quite happy using.

          Like if your product is good and works don’t start a new product then start changing the original product solely to integrate the new product. That’s bad for the existing users and customers.

          It just seems like a constant thing with them that always leads back to squeezing more data and money out of users at the detriment to everything else then gaslighting users by using phrases like “improved user experience”

          I actually just scrolled down some more after writing all this and there’s a good comment with some of they whys on what I was saying

          https://slrpnk.net/comment/1679100

      • HughJanus@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why do people fuck up things that work?

        Depends on what you mean by “work”. If by “work” you mean is enjoyable to use, I understand. If by “work” you mean sustains a business, then no.

        • ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It obviously is a sustainable business. What they want to do is fatten the cow before slaughter

            • Schaedelbach@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah, but only because Reddit wants to become more than they are! All the coins, nfts (yes, they already sell them), useless functions and redesigns they implemented over the years, while simultaneously giving a shit about what made Reddit useful and interesting. They had a chance to be better than the rest and give us (and by that I mean user who used Reddit often) a way to pay for what we liked but more and more they pushed people like me away with all the convoluted and microtransactiony way to spend money.

              Eh, whatever. I like it here better now!

              • HughJanus@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                They had a chance to be better than the rest and give us…a way to pay for what we liked

                You wouldn’t have paid. No one would have paid. It’s as simple as that. People are happy to pay with their data and their attention, but not with their money, which is why they forced everyone onto their first-party app where they can mine your data and push notifications to keep you engaged, all while ensuring you’re forced to look at their ads.

                Not to mention charging AI companies money to mine the information you’ve contributed to their platform that they were previously bypassing via the API.

                • Schaedelbach@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You wouldn’t have paid

                  Eh, I don’t pay for Tv or have a lot of subscriptions but I actually pay for YouTube premium because there are channels I follow for more than ten years at this point. And because I know that some of this money goes to the creators (not all, I know) I feel like it’s money well spent for content I actually enjoy. So, with all that said: if Reddit would have given me an option to pay a reasonable amount to browse it on an app of my choice I am pretty sure I would have done that, because some of content and communities were also a part of my life for way longer than ten years.

                  I can kinda see where you are coming from, though. Not enough people would have paid the way I would have done. People like free stuff. I do too.

            • ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The more I think about it. I think you’re right. No more 0% loans so cheap debt is hard and interest starts accruing.

  • SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    153
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think Reddit doesn’t realize that what made their UI so appealing was precisely that it felt really functional and bare bones, like Craigslist still does or Google used to. As if it was designed by nerds who just wanted the most functional site. It makes it seem more trustworthy and neutral, less monetized.

    This redesign looks painfully corporate.

    • lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      1 year ago

      I used RIF for the longest time and I just can’t with the official app. It’s already awful and if that’s what the website looks like now then the app will have a worse UI soon.

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Unfortunately he is making it for tildes, a platform run by a single admin who bans people who have discussions about difficult topics

          • jivandabeast@lemmy.browntown.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah that’s what I’ve seen too, I don’t know why he chose tildes? It’s not talked about, like at all. Seems like a big chunk of his userbase came over here

            • SupraMario@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The admin there who owns the place seems to want to keep it small, so yes no clue why he is making his app over there at this point. It’s clear the owner of tildes doesn’t want the place to grow. He just wants a bunch of people circle jerking each other in their echo chamber.

            • SupraMario@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Uhh, no…I was banned for discussing a topic about how obesity is the number one killer and not tobacco…how is that a dog whistle?

              But to people like you, anything you disagree with… instant nazi right?

        • lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I check in on one specific community and feel sad that the users are still there. But one of them signed up here today so there is hope!

          • jivandabeast@lemmy.browntown.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I was being a little cheeky, I get it. I have a personal feed of reddit posts that get pulled from the subs i miss without me needing to visit the site.

            The migration will be slow, but hopefully steady! Honestly, the lack of content kinda sucks but its much higher quality and the discussions here are way more personal which is really nice.

        • SpeedLimit55@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Still use reddit and twitter for sports news and updates and a few fringe topics and I read only. Shut down my reddit account around 2019 and only have a twitter account because its a pain to view stuff if not logged in. Have never posted anything there.

    • whofearsthenight@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 year ago

      Topics on the side. “Gaming, Sports, Business, Crypto…” Reddit trying really hard to pretend it’s not just around for porn and memes. Also, crypto lol. Tech bro a little harder, spez.

      • asteriskeverything@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Dude idk crypto was fucking DROWNING r/all for a long time, maybe still is I eventually blocked it, so I get why they added it. And I think the type of person who would stick around on reddit or start now would still be into/interested in starting crypto.

        I hope it is obvious that is not a compliment.

        • DrQuint@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I basically blocked every single crypto community. But around the time of the GameStop bullshit, a LOT more of them started cropping up. I thought I was safe, then two days later another one pops up. And it was always the same non-discussion bullshit.

          Worse than a scam, crypto is a cult.

      • egeres@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, that really feels like there is a huge disconnect with their core user-base 🤦🏻‍♂️

      • Gsus4@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        True, at this point they might as well rebrand to PM&C: porn, memes and crypto

    • voluble@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think when companies that originally offered something unique and desirable get large enough, they necessarily lose touch with what made them indispensable. Dollar signs lead to a notion of growth that summons a many-tentacled cocaine-caked Moloch of feature creep, tech bandwagon hopping, information siloing, data harvesting, advertiser worshiping, and corporate evil that is, at best, indifferent to user experience, but more typically actively antagonistic to it.

    • christophski@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      We are no longer their target audience, they don’t care what made it appealing to us. They are trying to position themselves as being the same as YouTube, Instagram, Facebook.

  • phi1997@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    1 year ago

    If it was Fischer-Price, it would be colorful. This is just the sort of bland, generic website UI you see everywhere

      • phi1997@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Honestly, I would take the look of Windows XP over the look of Windows 10/11 or current MacOS. Of course, I’m on Linux, so I actually can do that

      • Roboticide@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not. It’s a common mathematical fallacy stumbled upon by crackpots who think they’re geniuses and have found a fundamental problem with math.

        There’s a math professor at Harvard who gets sent this “proof” like once a month.

        • stebo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          The fallacy here is the 1- in front of the limit. 0.999… = lim_n->∞{1-1/n} = 1-lim_n->∞{1/n} = 1-0 = 1, which simply proves that 0.999… = 1

  • owiseedoubleyou@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The fact that crypto is listed on the side makes me wanna bump my head on the wall.

    The whole thing in general looks like a mobile app stretched to fit on a monitor. I mean, that’s how most websites are in 2023.

      • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s not a mobile first principal. Mobile first design and development includes progressive enhancement as the viewport grows. You can make a website that operates perfectly on mobile and desktop. These fucks just don’t actually adhere to any philosophies or standards. Don’t blame mobile first, which is a brilliant approach, for the shortcomings of a dumb-ass company like Reddit.

        • imapuppetlookaway@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s called “responsive design” i think. I played around with it a bit when learning html years ago. You can get free website templates that have this cooked in - like, you don’t need to code anything. Seems easy to do and pretty much an industry standard now. Pretty weird that reddit would choose a trashy option instead.

          • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Responsive design is approach you can use as part of your mobile first development. There are others, but responsive is a good one.

          • rich@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah I used bootstrap for building some websites almost a decade ago now, and I used responsive design. You could have the website in a small browser window and it’d appear as the mobile version with a navbar at the top. As you drag the window wider it slowly morphed into the desktop version.

      • ZiemekZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Mandatory Website Obesity Crisis mention, TL;DR:

        Some kind of brain parasite infected designers back when the iPad came out, and they haven’t recovered. Everything now has to look like a touchscreen.

        My gripe with this design aesthetic is the loss of information density. I’m an adult human being sitting at a large display, with a mouse and keyboard. I deserve better. Not every interface should be designed for someone surfing the web from their toilet.

        It’s like we woke up one morning in 2008 to find that our Lego had all turned to Duplo. Sites that used to show useful data now look like cartoons. Interface elements are big and chunky. Any hint of complexity has been pushed deep into some sub-hamburger. Sites target novice users on touchscreens at everyone else’s expense.

        I shouldn’t need sled dogs and pemmican to navigate your visual design.

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      A lot of apps are also just web wrappers for a mobile site… It’s obvious with some apps, others are a bit harder to see, but it’s there.

      Low effort app developing.

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It looks like a news site from 2012, and it actually looks like it’s trying to imitate digg lol

    • asteriskeverything@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Seriously me too!! I was paying more attention to the TV show I was watching and was wondering what was so remarkable about the same old YouTube layout. I had to wait for it to end to really look at the picture DAYUMN it looks like YouTube. Wtf reddit what a weird thing to copy

      • Danc4498@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Almost like when they replaced the reddit app with one that looked just like Instagram. Reddit has no originality I guess.

    • Blisterexe@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      The worst part is that the Lemmy photon ui (m.lemmy.zip) is also modern looking, just way more practical (also has settings to make it less padded)

  • BassTurd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    So stop using it. Ffs, this place circle jerks over how bad that place is, and then you dumb mother fuckers keep going back. Move on already.

    • knotthatone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Eh. it’s one thing always talking about Reddit in more general communities, but this is a Reddit community.

    • WookieMunster@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The magazine is called ‘Reddit’… what are you doing here if you’re tired of hearing about it?

      • BassTurd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        34
        ·
        1 year ago

        Getting news about Reddit and ideally its downfall is why I’m here. Reading people complain about it and then turn around and support it is not. Initially I subbed to this right after I left to see what was happening without going back. Now it’s often just a bunch of idiots jerking each other off while redditing.

        • notenoughbutter@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          you read?

          this community is specifically about reddit, like we talk about reddit here

          go to some other community and ignore this one

        • AreaSIX @lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          So, everyone who didn’t choose to abandon the platform you yourself admit to have been using until recently, at the exact time that you decided was appropriate to abandon it completely, is an idiot? I think you should try to recalibrate your attitude regarding things like this my friend. That’s an unnecessarily harsh way to view other people’s choices IMO. It poisons the conversation, but more importantly, it poisons your own mood.

    • norbert@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      I haven’t been back since June 12th so I get what you’re saying but the name of this mag is reddit, it seems like an appropriate place to talk about it.

    • sexy_peach@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      What? I will always use reddit as long as it has good content that I can’t find elsewhere. Still spend lots of time here to help Lemmy grow and make it eventually get better than reddit.