I was Nobara user, then I am using Fedora right now. I want to use things like Hyprland etc. and ya know, Its damn cool to say I am using arch btw. So I’ve decided to use Arch Linux. But everyone says its always breaking and gives problems. That’s because of users, not OS… right? I love to deal with problems but I don’t want to waste my time. Is Arch really problemful OS? Should I use it? I know what to do with setup/ usage, the hardness of Arch is not problem for me but I am just concerned about the mindset “Arch always gets broken”.

  • Darkrai@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Ones of the reasons I like Pop, they install a recovery partition with a copy of the install USB, finally they have a ‘factory reset’ that reinstalls the OS while keeping the users home folders.

    • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      This is really great. Windows has something similar, just having a superstable parallel OS is a blunt but working solution.