Sjmarf@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · edit-2hace 6 meses“ARE YOU ALL SEEING THIS”sh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square86fedilinkarrow-up1547arrow-down131
arrow-up1516arrow-down1image“ARE YOU ALL SEEING THIS”sh.itjust.worksSjmarf@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · edit-2hace 6 mesesmessage-square86fedilink
minus-squarevzq@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down1·hace 6 mesesRight? It’s less letters and it’s pretty clear. I haven’t found a good action neutral replacement for “black list” yet though. “Deny list” and “block list” are too action-specific.
minus-squarephorq@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEspañolarrow-up2·hace 6 mesesOr enemy list, but that might be too presidential…
minus-squarenintendiatorlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·hace 6 mesesMaybe you jest but now I’m seriously wondering why hasn’t this been proposed. It’s defo better than something like “disallow list”.
Right? It’s less letters and it’s pretty clear.
I haven’t found a good action neutral replacement for “black list” yet though. “Deny list” and “block list” are too action-specific.
Sounds like a nono list to me!
Or enemy list, but that might be too presidential…
Maybe you jest but now I’m seriously wondering why hasn’t this been proposed. It’s defo better than something like “disallow list”.
Shit list?