• flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    As much as some of us may dislike it when a company does these kinds of things. You can’t really blame them for following the laws of the country that they are headquartered in.

    You can blame them for operating there to begin with in cases like Apple in China, but you could hardly blame them for following the laws of the US where they are headquartered for example.

    If the law of the land where the headquarters is requires them to give up the data they do have to partner nations then they don’t really have much choice in the long run if they want to continue to exist.

    • baseless_discourse@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Plus there isn’t many jurisdictions with stronger privacy law than the swiss. It is unlike they made a bad choice for choosing a headquarters.

      I guess they can operate on the public sea or the arctic, but I imagine the commute will be terrible.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      6 months ago

      “Nobody’s going to jail for you” is pretty much the way to think about any cloud privacy service. They may not keep logs unless they’re required to, but in the end, they will comply to stay in business.