I loved Reddit for what it is, but nothing made me back out of a post faster than seeing the top 3 parent threads as a regurgitation of the same inside jokes, pun-chains, and so on.

  • Dialectic Cake@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I think it’s natural to want the majority of posts to meet one’s preferences but what one finds interesting/entertaining/etc. varies for each person.

    I love diversity and choice and so I’m happy that each community can have their own individual rules/cultures and we can pick which communities we want to join. E.g., I wouldn’t expect the same behaviour/rules/culture in a shit posting community compared to an arch linux community, but I’m glad both types of communities and content will exist.

    We can collectively choose what kinds of unique cakes to bake and we can choose which cakes to eat too. :D

    • not_woody_shaw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sounds like a good AI feature for a Lemmy client app. “✅ I don’t want to see comments that only contain a pun.”

      • 1993_toyota_camry@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        this was something I loved about slashdot moderation. When voting, people had to specify the reason for the vote. +1 funny, +1 insightful, +1 informative, -1 troll, -1 misleading, etc.

        That way you can, for example, set in your user preferences to ignore positive votes for comedy, and put extra value on informative votes.

        Then, to keep people from spamming up/down votes and to encourage them to think about their choices, they only gave out a limited number of moderation points to readers. So you’d have to choose which comments to spend your 5 points on.

        Then finally, they had ‘meta moderation’ where you’d be shown a comment, and asked “would a vote of insightful be appropriate for this comment” to catch people who down-voted out of disagreement or personal vandetta. Any users who regularly mis-voted would stop receiving the ability to vote.

        I don’t think this is directly applicable to a federated system, but I do think it’s one of the best-thought-out voting systems ever created for a discussion board.

        edit: a couple other points i liked about it:

        Comments were capped at (iirc) +5 and -1. Further votes wouldn’t change the comment’s score.

        User karma wasn’t shown. The user page would just say Karma: good. Or Excellent, or poor, or some other vague term.

        • Dialectic Cake@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s so dreamy that I created a feature request post linking to your comment. (I also did an @ you but not sure I did that right.)

        • 0101010001110100@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          This seems like a great system.
          I really hate all the reddit awards. I didn’t even know they exist until I opened the steve huffman ama in new reddit, and it had about a million awards that were all a different (moving/sparkling) emoji. Facebook has those too, all the little icons for like, haha, sad, heart etc. I find that stuff really distracting to look at and it’s one of many reasons i refuse to use facebook, or reddit’s official website & app.
          Something like you’re describing sounds like it would work really well though, especially if there were just maybe different colours or something for the upvote/downvote type, instead of space-wasting icons and images.

          • 1993_toyota_camry@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yeah, their layout is dated, but the scoring system doesn’t take much room (once you accept the idea that a reply can have a subject line):

    • killerinstinct101@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wouldn’t expect the same behaviour/rules/culture in a shit posting community compared to an arch linux community

      What’s the difference?