• ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 months ago

    just two pieces of data: the date the target Signal account was created, and the date that it last connected to the service.

    And how does Usernames help here? Should be the same 2 data Points and not more?

    • BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      8 months ago

      The idea is that you change or remove your username after someone else starts a conversation with you, so the username can no longer be used to subpoena your account details.

      Put another way, signal is able to provide those 2 pieces of information to law enforcement based on a phone number. This helps you to prevent law enforcement having a phone number to ask signal to look up in the first place, assuming you change your username every time you hand it out.

      They also hash the usernames that they store on your account which means law enforcement can’t ask what usernames are being used, only being able to ask for specific usernames which are currently in use.

      • LWD@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        I understand that right now LEA can serve up a subpoena and give Signal a username and get a phone number, but they can’t give them a phone number and get a username.

        Is it also possible for Signal to keep track of past usernames/associated hashes for a particular phone number?

        (For comparison, Signal could record IP addresses, but we trust they don’t due to unsealed cases. Could they keep a username history?)

        • BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yes it entirely depends on whether they store previously used usernames along with the date range it was in use (to tell apart multiple people who used the same username at different times)

          We’ll have to see if any unsealed cases in the future support that they don’t keep those records like how they don’t keep IP logs, but personally their track record is enough for me to have confidence in the feature, especially since my “threat model” is primarily opportunistic hackers or spearphishers at most, not police or state / nation state level actors.

    • zaph@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      My phone number is registered to my phone carrier under my real name. My username is not. Unless I’ve misunderstood the question.

    • Natanael@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      They don’t track username history and don’t have a server side list of plaintext usernames, and others can’t find your phone number from the username alone. That makes it harder to confirm which account is yours.

    • rdyoung@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Iirc from the last time this article or similar was posted, it’s about how warrants are issued. It’s the username versus phone number not username versus or and/or other data points. Anything more than that I am still unclear about.