• thejevans@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Relying on individual consumer choices to change the direction of a multinational company to a direction that is clearly less profitable is laughably naive.

      • Big P@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah, there’s companies out there literally destroying the planet or causing deaths and consumers don’t care. They’re not gonna stop using their shiny rectangle over this

    • SmoochyPit@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      I don’t anticipate it, most consumers don’t take the time to be critical or try alternatives. :(

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Jesus, MacBooks cost 5K? That’s ridiculous, I’d expect that for a nice gaming laptop.

          It’s a good point. The only bespoke thing on there, as far as I can tell, is the R1 chip. I assume a cord with enough bandwidth could be found in order to have a more modular system. The MacBook end may or may not have the port capacity for that, though.

            • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              If I was designing it, my first instinct would be to make a headset that renders fairly arbitrary surfaces over the environment using as much hardwired custom silicon logic as possible, and leaves everything else external. You should be able to achieve pretty incredible energy efficiency that way, using any number of unconventional logic schemes, as well as minimising headset weight. The main question is how much you can pre-calculate without knowing the fine details about how the user is oriented this millisecond.

              We’ll see what the R2 looks like. As far as I can tell the R1 is just a bespoke arrangement of more conventional cores.

      • Eggyhead@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s too late for Apple to close off macOS (and they’ve tried), so I think the goggles are meant to replace it altogether with an inherently closed platform. I hope Apple ends up having to open that platform up as well before it’s too late.

  • MimicJar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 months ago

    The era of Apple slowly opening up its platforms and devices without government intervention has ended.

    When was this ever true? Apple has always been a walled garden.

  • pax@rblind.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    sadly, you are right, I’ll return to android when ever I will be able to.