• Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    I didn’t say any researcher or anything had named it intelligence. Nor am I trying to be semantically correct.

    Read the guys comments. He’s trying to push the idea that we can “change” it’s “understanding” about the things it’s discussing. He is one of the people who has fallen for the tech bros etc convincing people it is intelligent. I’m not fighting semantics, I’m trying to explain to him that it’s not intelligent. Because he himself clearly doesn’t understand that.

    • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Why do you seem to think it’s impossible to change how AI understands things? It’s just an algorithm. It’s just a fancy set of math functions that gets you from noise to something that looks like something. Of COURSE we can change how this process works, have it weigh other things, and get something that generates based on a different paradigm than we currently have. All you seem to try to do is be semantically correct.

    • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      That’s just silly, as if there is no nuance whatsoever. You can ofc change its understanding. Depending on your definition, different types of models could be interpreted as intelligent in certain areas. You can be rational, you know, not everything needs to be black and white. It’s also possible that since even the experts in the field don’t fully grasp it, maybe you don’t either.